Expressing Inflection Tonally
In Limburg Dutch, the difference between neuter and feminine agreement on adjectives is expressed by a difference in lexical tone. This paper argues that this distinction is due to a difference in underlying representations and not to a paradigmatic antifaithfulness effect. In particular, it argues...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Langue: | CA EN |
| Publié: |
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
2005
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/6be1ba6179fe40a7b0eb071b1f401f1d |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| Résumé: | In Limburg Dutch, the difference between neuter and feminine agreement on adjectives is expressed by a difference in lexical tone. This paper argues that this distinction is due to a difference in underlying representations and not to a paradigmatic antifaithfulness effect. In particular, it argues for a specific version of REALIZE-MORPHEME, the constraint demanding every underlying morpheme to be present in phonological surface representations. The key argument is that a schwa suffix turns up whenever the tonal change from neuter to feminine is not possible. |
|---|