The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays

Abstract When we knock on a door, we perceive the impact as a collection of simultaneous events, combining sound, sight, and tactile sensation. In reality, information from different modalities but from a single source is flowing inside the brain along different pathways, reaching processing centers...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raz Leib, Amir Karniel, Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6bfab0bfc97140ee913526509ad8974b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6bfab0bfc97140ee913526509ad8974b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6bfab0bfc97140ee913526509ad8974b2021-12-02T12:32:06ZThe Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays10.1038/s41598-017-07289-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6bfab0bfc97140ee913526509ad8974b2017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07289-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract When we knock on a door, we perceive the impact as a collection of simultaneous events, combining sound, sight, and tactile sensation. In reality, information from different modalities but from a single source is flowing inside the brain along different pathways, reaching processing centers at different times. Therefore, interpreting different sensory modalities which seem to occur simultaneously requires information processing that accounts for these different delays. As in a computer-based robotic system, does the brain use some explicit estimation of the time delay, to realign the sensory flows? Or does it compensate for temporal delays by representing them as changes in the body/environment mechanics? Using delayed-state or an approximation for delayed-state manipulations between visual and proprioceptive feedback during a tracking task, we show that tracking errors, grip forces, and learning curves are consistent with predictions of a representation that is based on approximation for delay, refuting an explicit delayed-state representation. Delayed-state representations are based on estimating the time elapsed between the movement commands and their observed consequences. In contrast, an approximation for delay representations result from estimating the instantaneous relation between the expected and observed motion variables, without explicit reference to time.Raz LeibAmir KarnielFerdinando A. Mussa-IvaldiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Raz Leib
Amir Karniel
Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi
The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays
description Abstract When we knock on a door, we perceive the impact as a collection of simultaneous events, combining sound, sight, and tactile sensation. In reality, information from different modalities but from a single source is flowing inside the brain along different pathways, reaching processing centers at different times. Therefore, interpreting different sensory modalities which seem to occur simultaneously requires information processing that accounts for these different delays. As in a computer-based robotic system, does the brain use some explicit estimation of the time delay, to realign the sensory flows? Or does it compensate for temporal delays by representing them as changes in the body/environment mechanics? Using delayed-state or an approximation for delayed-state manipulations between visual and proprioceptive feedback during a tracking task, we show that tracking errors, grip forces, and learning curves are consistent with predictions of a representation that is based on approximation for delay, refuting an explicit delayed-state representation. Delayed-state representations are based on estimating the time elapsed between the movement commands and their observed consequences. In contrast, an approximation for delay representations result from estimating the instantaneous relation between the expected and observed motion variables, without explicit reference to time.
format article
author Raz Leib
Amir Karniel
Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi
author_facet Raz Leib
Amir Karniel
Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi
author_sort Raz Leib
title The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays
title_short The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays
title_full The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays
title_fullStr The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays
title_full_unstemmed The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays
title_sort mechanical representation of temporal delays
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/6bfab0bfc97140ee913526509ad8974b
work_keys_str_mv AT razleib themechanicalrepresentationoftemporaldelays
AT amirkarniel themechanicalrepresentationoftemporaldelays
AT ferdinandoamussaivaldi themechanicalrepresentationoftemporaldelays
AT razleib mechanicalrepresentationoftemporaldelays
AT amirkarniel mechanicalrepresentationoftemporaldelays
AT ferdinandoamussaivaldi mechanicalrepresentationoftemporaldelays
_version_ 1718394163231195136