Integrating inflammatory serum biomarkers into a risk calculator for prostate cancer detection

Abstract Improved prostate cancer detection methods would avoid over-diagnosis of clinically indolent disease informing appropriate treatment decisions. The aims of this study were to investigate the role of a panel of Inflammation biomarkers to inform the need for a biopsy to diagnose prostate canc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amirhossein Jalali, Michael Kitching, Kenneth Martin, Ciaran Richardson, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Stephen Peter FitzGerald, Ronald William Watson, Antoinette Sabrina Perry
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6c13b9d6b64942d2abb4f6e7fe734e43
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Improved prostate cancer detection methods would avoid over-diagnosis of clinically indolent disease informing appropriate treatment decisions. The aims of this study were to investigate the role of a panel of Inflammation biomarkers to inform the need for a biopsy to diagnose prostate cancer. Peripheral blood serum obtained from 436 men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy were assessed for a panel of 18 inflammatory serum biomarkers in addition to Total and Free Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). This panel was integrated into a previously developed Irish clinical risk calculator (IPRC) for the detection of prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason Score ≥ 7). Using logistic regression and multinomial regression methods, two models (Logst-RC and Multi-RC) were developed considering linear and nonlinear effects of the panel in conjunction with clinical and demographic parameters for determination of the two endpoints. Both models significantly improved the predictive ability of the clinical model for detection of prostate cancer (from 0.656 to 0.731 for Logst-RC and 0.713 for Multi-RC) and high-grade prostate cancer (from 0.716 to 0.785 for Logst-RC and 0.767 for Multi-RC) and demonstrated higher clinical net benefit. This improved discriminatory power and clinical utility may allow for individualised risk stratification improving clinical decision making.