Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.

<h4>Background</h4>Accurate methods of HIV incidence determination are critically needed to monitor the epidemic and determine the population level impact of prevention trials. One such trial, Project Accept, a Phase III, community-randomized trial, evaluated the impact of enhanced, comm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver Laeyendecker, Michal Kulich, Deborah Donnell, Arnošt Komárek, Marek Omelka, Caroline E Mullis, Greg Szekeres, Estelle Piwowar-Manning, Agnes Fiamma, Ronald H Gray, Tom Lutalo, Charles S Morrison, Robert A Salata, Tsungai Chipato, Connie Celum, Erin M Kahle, Taha E Taha, Newton I Kumwenda, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Vivek Naranbhai, Jairam R Lingappa, Michael D Sweat, Thomas Coates, Susan H Eshleman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6c641db5cff34cad825b14fb1cc40c12
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6c641db5cff34cad825b14fb1cc40c12
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6c641db5cff34cad825b14fb1cc40c122021-11-18T08:46:53ZDevelopment of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0078818https://doaj.org/article/6c641db5cff34cad825b14fb1cc40c122013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24236054/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Accurate methods of HIV incidence determination are critically needed to monitor the epidemic and determine the population level impact of prevention trials. One such trial, Project Accept, a Phase III, community-randomized trial, evaluated the impact of enhanced, community-based voluntary counseling and testing on population-level HIV incidence. The primary endpoint of the trial was based on a single, cross-sectional, post-intervention HIV incidence assessment.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Test performance of HIV incidence determination was evaluated for 403 multi-assay algorithms [MAAs] that included the BED capture immunoassay [BED-CEIA] alone, an avidity assay alone, and combinations of these assays at different cutoff values with and without CD4 and viral load testing on samples from seven African cohorts (5,325 samples from 3,436 individuals with known duration of HIV infection [1 month to >10 years]). The mean window period (average time individuals appear positive for a given algorithm) and performance in estimating an incidence estimate (in terms of bias and variance) of these MAAs were evaluated in three simulated epidemic scenarios (stable, emerging and waning). The power of different test methods to detect a 35% reduction in incidence in the matched communities of Project Accept was also assessed. A MAA was identified that included BED-CEIA, the avidity assay, CD4 cell count, and viral load that had a window period of 259 days, accurately estimated HIV incidence in all three epidemic settings and provided sufficient power to detect an intervention effect in Project Accept.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In a Southern African setting, HIV incidence estimates and intervention effects can be accurately estimated from cross-sectional surveys using a MAA. The improved accuracy in cross-sectional incidence testing that a MAA provides is a powerful tool for HIV surveillance and program evaluation.Oliver LaeyendeckerMichal KulichDeborah DonnellArnošt KomárekMarek OmelkaCaroline E MullisGreg SzekeresEstelle Piwowar-ManningAgnes FiammaRonald H GrayTom LutaloCharles S MorrisonRobert A SalataTsungai ChipatoConnie CelumErin M KahleTaha E TahaNewton I KumwendaQuarraisha Abdool KarimVivek NaranbhaiJairam R LingappaMichael D SweatThomas CoatesSusan H EshlemanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 11, p e78818 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Oliver Laeyendecker
Michal Kulich
Deborah Donnell
Arnošt Komárek
Marek Omelka
Caroline E Mullis
Greg Szekeres
Estelle Piwowar-Manning
Agnes Fiamma
Ronald H Gray
Tom Lutalo
Charles S Morrison
Robert A Salata
Tsungai Chipato
Connie Celum
Erin M Kahle
Taha E Taha
Newton I Kumwenda
Quarraisha Abdool Karim
Vivek Naranbhai
Jairam R Lingappa
Michael D Sweat
Thomas Coates
Susan H Eshleman
Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
description <h4>Background</h4>Accurate methods of HIV incidence determination are critically needed to monitor the epidemic and determine the population level impact of prevention trials. One such trial, Project Accept, a Phase III, community-randomized trial, evaluated the impact of enhanced, community-based voluntary counseling and testing on population-level HIV incidence. The primary endpoint of the trial was based on a single, cross-sectional, post-intervention HIV incidence assessment.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Test performance of HIV incidence determination was evaluated for 403 multi-assay algorithms [MAAs] that included the BED capture immunoassay [BED-CEIA] alone, an avidity assay alone, and combinations of these assays at different cutoff values with and without CD4 and viral load testing on samples from seven African cohorts (5,325 samples from 3,436 individuals with known duration of HIV infection [1 month to >10 years]). The mean window period (average time individuals appear positive for a given algorithm) and performance in estimating an incidence estimate (in terms of bias and variance) of these MAAs were evaluated in three simulated epidemic scenarios (stable, emerging and waning). The power of different test methods to detect a 35% reduction in incidence in the matched communities of Project Accept was also assessed. A MAA was identified that included BED-CEIA, the avidity assay, CD4 cell count, and viral load that had a window period of 259 days, accurately estimated HIV incidence in all three epidemic settings and provided sufficient power to detect an intervention effect in Project Accept.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In a Southern African setting, HIV incidence estimates and intervention effects can be accurately estimated from cross-sectional surveys using a MAA. The improved accuracy in cross-sectional incidence testing that a MAA provides is a powerful tool for HIV surveillance and program evaluation.
format article
author Oliver Laeyendecker
Michal Kulich
Deborah Donnell
Arnošt Komárek
Marek Omelka
Caroline E Mullis
Greg Szekeres
Estelle Piwowar-Manning
Agnes Fiamma
Ronald H Gray
Tom Lutalo
Charles S Morrison
Robert A Salata
Tsungai Chipato
Connie Celum
Erin M Kahle
Taha E Taha
Newton I Kumwenda
Quarraisha Abdool Karim
Vivek Naranbhai
Jairam R Lingappa
Michael D Sweat
Thomas Coates
Susan H Eshleman
author_facet Oliver Laeyendecker
Michal Kulich
Deborah Donnell
Arnošt Komárek
Marek Omelka
Caroline E Mullis
Greg Szekeres
Estelle Piwowar-Manning
Agnes Fiamma
Ronald H Gray
Tom Lutalo
Charles S Morrison
Robert A Salata
Tsungai Chipato
Connie Celum
Erin M Kahle
Taha E Taha
Newton I Kumwenda
Quarraisha Abdool Karim
Vivek Naranbhai
Jairam R Lingappa
Michael D Sweat
Thomas Coates
Susan H Eshleman
author_sort Oliver Laeyendecker
title Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
title_short Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
title_full Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
title_fullStr Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
title_full_unstemmed Development of methods for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
title_sort development of methods for cross-sectional hiv incidence estimation in a large, community randomized trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/6c641db5cff34cad825b14fb1cc40c12
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverlaeyendecker developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT michalkulich developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT deborahdonnell developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT arnostkomarek developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT marekomelka developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT carolineemullis developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT gregszekeres developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT estellepiwowarmanning developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT agnesfiamma developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT ronaldhgray developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT tomlutalo developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT charlessmorrison developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT robertasalata developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT tsungaichipato developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT conniecelum developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT erinmkahle developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT tahaetaha developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT newtonikumwenda developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT quarraishaabdoolkarim developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT viveknaranbhai developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT jairamrlingappa developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT michaeldsweat developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT thomascoates developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT susanheshleman developmentofmethodsforcrosssectionalhivincidenceestimationinalargecommunityrandomizedtrial
_version_ 1718421326683701248