Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study

Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study

Eyal Cohen,1,2 Amir Rosenblatt,1,2 Sandy Bornstein,2 Anat Loewenstein,1,2 Adiel Barak,1,2 Shulamit Schwartz1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Purpose: To evaluate the surgical out...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen E, Rosenblatt A, Bornstein S, Loewenstein A, Barak A, Schwartz S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Chandelier
Endoillumination
Retinal detachment
Scleral buckle
Wide angled viewing system
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6ca54bf64b31481fa30801f48bcaa93e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6ca54bf64b31481fa30801f48bcaa93e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6ca54bf64b31481fa30801f48bcaa93e2021-12-02T09:04:54ZWide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/6ca54bf64b31481fa30801f48bcaa93e2019-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/wide-angled-endoillumination-vs-traditional-scleral-buckling-surgery-f-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Eyal Cohen,1,2 Amir Rosenblatt,1,2 Sandy Bornstein,2 Anat Loewenstein,1,2 Adiel Barak,1,2 Shulamit Schwartz1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of traditional scleral buckling (TSB) compared to chandelier-assisted scleral buckling (CSB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.Patients and methods: A retrospective interventional comparative case series of 49 eyes that underwent SB procedure. Medical records of 27 and 22 eyes that underwent TSB and CSB surgery, respectively, were evaluated. Outcome measures included primary anatomical success, visual acuity (VA), and perioperative complications.Results: Primary reattachment rate was similar with 85.2% in the TCB group and 81.8% in the CSB group (P=1.00); eight patients needed one additional operation or gas injection with a final reattachment rate of 100% at 6 months. Mean VA in the CSB group improved from 20/60 at presentation to 20/35, 6 months postoperatively. In the TSB group, VA improved from 20/80 to 20/45 (P=0.90). Among the eyes that were successfully reattached with either SB approach, two eyes in each group had cataract progression and none of them required surgery during follow-up. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed.Conclusion: CSB is a modified technique with an advantage of superior visualization compared with the traditional surgery, which simplifies the operation, enhance competency, and could be used as a valuable educational tool. It can provide similar anatomical and functional outcomes with no additional perioperative complications. Keywords: chandelier, endoillumination, retinal detachment, scleral buckle, wide-angled viewing systemCohen ERosenblatt ABornstein SLoewenstein ABarak ASchwartz SDove Medical PressarticleChandelierEndoilluminationRetinal detachmentScleral buckleWide angled viewing systemOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 13, Pp 287-293 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Chandelier
Endoillumination
Retinal detachment
Scleral buckle
Wide angled viewing system
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Chandelier
Endoillumination
Retinal detachment
Scleral buckle
Wide angled viewing system
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Cohen E
Rosenblatt A
Bornstein S
Loewenstein A
Barak A
Schwartz S
Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
description Eyal Cohen,1,2 Amir Rosenblatt,1,2 Sandy Bornstein,2 Anat Loewenstein,1,2 Adiel Barak,1,2 Shulamit Schwartz1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of traditional scleral buckling (TSB) compared to chandelier-assisted scleral buckling (CSB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.Patients and methods: A retrospective interventional comparative case series of 49 eyes that underwent SB procedure. Medical records of 27 and 22 eyes that underwent TSB and CSB surgery, respectively, were evaluated. Outcome measures included primary anatomical success, visual acuity (VA), and perioperative complications.Results: Primary reattachment rate was similar with 85.2% in the TCB group and 81.8% in the CSB group (P=1.00); eight patients needed one additional operation or gas injection with a final reattachment rate of 100% at 6 months. Mean VA in the CSB group improved from 20/60 at presentation to 20/35, 6 months postoperatively. In the TSB group, VA improved from 20/80 to 20/45 (P=0.90). Among the eyes that were successfully reattached with either SB approach, two eyes in each group had cataract progression and none of them required surgery during follow-up. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed.Conclusion: CSB is a modified technique with an advantage of superior visualization compared with the traditional surgery, which simplifies the operation, enhance competency, and could be used as a valuable educational tool. It can provide similar anatomical and functional outcomes with no additional perioperative complications. Keywords: chandelier, endoillumination, retinal detachment, scleral buckle, wide-angled viewing system
format article
author Cohen E
Rosenblatt A
Bornstein S
Loewenstein A
Barak A
Schwartz S
author_facet Cohen E
Rosenblatt A
Bornstein S
Loewenstein A
Barak A
Schwartz S
author_sort Cohen E
title Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
title_short Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
title_full Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
title_fullStr Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
title_sort wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment – a comparative study
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/6ca54bf64b31481fa30801f48bcaa93e
work_keys_str_mv AT cohene wideangledendoilluminationvstraditionalscleralbucklingsurgeryforretinaldetachmentndashacomparativestudy
AT rosenblatta wideangledendoilluminationvstraditionalscleralbucklingsurgeryforretinaldetachmentndashacomparativestudy
AT bornsteins wideangledendoilluminationvstraditionalscleralbucklingsurgeryforretinaldetachmentndashacomparativestudy
AT loewensteina wideangledendoilluminationvstraditionalscleralbucklingsurgeryforretinaldetachmentndashacomparativestudy
AT baraka wideangledendoilluminationvstraditionalscleralbucklingsurgeryforretinaldetachmentndashacomparativestudy
AT schwartzs wideangledendoilluminationvstraditionalscleralbucklingsurgeryforretinaldetachmentndashacomparativestudy
_version_ 1718398249613656064

Ejemplares similares