Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement

The debates over the problem of faultless disagreement have played a major role in shaping the landscape of today’s semantic theories. In my paper, I argue that even though the existent contextualism-friendly proposals explain a lot of disagreement data by specifying various ways in which speakers m...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Natalia Karczewska
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	CS EN SK
Publicado:	Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:	contextualism commitment faultless disagreement speech act theory value terms Philosophy (General) B1-5802
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28303 https://doaj.org/article/6cae2c9c94084ff48ee28997cdb59a84
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6cae2c9c94084ff48ee28997cdb59a84
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6cae2c9c94084ff48ee28997cdb59a842021-11-30T16:16:07ZIllocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreementhttps://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.283031335-06682585-7150https://doaj.org/article/6cae2c9c94084ff48ee28997cdb59a842021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211031orgf.2021.28303.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1335-0668https://doaj.org/toc/2585-7150The debates over the problem of faultless disagreement have played a major role in shaping the landscape of today’s semantic theories. In my paper, I argue that even though the existent contextualism-friendly proposals explain a lot of disagreement data by specifying various ways in which speakers may use subjective predicates, neither provides a satisfactory account which would explain what all the subjective disagreements have in common. In particular, what is lacking is an explanation of the persistent autocentric cases (Lasersohn 2004), i.e., disagreements in which each speaker utters a subjective sentence while openly and knowingly occupying his or her own perspective. In my paper, I offer a solution which consists in supplementing the standard contextualist semantics with an explanation of this most problematic class of cases, which is possible due to redescribing the phenomena in speech act nomenclature.Natalia KarczewskaInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciencesarticlecontextualismcommitmentfaultless disagreementspeech act theoryvalue termsPhilosophy (General)B1-5802CSENSKOrganon F, Vol 28, Iss 3, Pp 531-556 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	CS EN SK
topic	contextualism commitment faultless disagreement speech act theory value terms Philosophy (General) B1-5802
spellingShingle	contextualism commitment faultless disagreement speech act theory value terms Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Natalia Karczewska Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement
description	The debates over the problem of faultless disagreement have played a major role in shaping the landscape of today’s semantic theories. In my paper, I argue that even though the existent contextualism-friendly proposals explain a lot of disagreement data by specifying various ways in which speakers may use subjective predicates, neither provides a satisfactory account which would explain what all the subjective disagreements have in common. In particular, what is lacking is an explanation of the persistent autocentric cases (Lasersohn 2004), i.e., disagreements in which each speaker utters a subjective sentence while openly and knowingly occupying his or her own perspective. In my paper, I offer a solution which consists in supplementing the standard contextualist semantics with an explanation of this most problematic class of cases, which is possible due to redescribing the phenomena in speech act nomenclature.
format	article
author	Natalia Karczewska
author_facet	Natalia Karczewska
author_sort	Natalia Karczewska
title	Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement
title_short	Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement
title_full	Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement
title_fullStr	Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement
title_full_unstemmed	Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement
title_sort	illocutionary disagreement in faultless disagreement
publisher	Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
publishDate	2021
url	https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28303 https://doaj.org/article/6cae2c9c94084ff48ee28997cdb59a84
work_keys_str_mv	AT nataliakarczewska illocutionarydisagreementinfaultlessdisagreement
_version_	1718406448346562560

Illocutionary Disagreement in Faultless Disagreement

Ejemplares similares