SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry
Abstract We combine SO(10) Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) with A 4 modular symmetry and present a comprehensive analysis of the resulting quark and lepton mass matrices for all the simplest cases. We focus on the case where the three fermion families in the 16 dimensional spinor representation form a...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
SpringerOpen
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6cc7a3e08cac4d11a844ba42bf879d10 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6cc7a3e08cac4d11a844ba42bf879d10 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6cc7a3e08cac4d11a844ba42bf879d102021-11-08T11:16:15ZSO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry10.1007/JHEP11(2021)0071029-8479https://doaj.org/article/6cc7a3e08cac4d11a844ba42bf879d102021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2021)007https://doaj.org/toc/1029-8479Abstract We combine SO(10) Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) with A 4 modular symmetry and present a comprehensive analysis of the resulting quark and lepton mass matrices for all the simplest cases. We focus on the case where the three fermion families in the 16 dimensional spinor representation form a triplet of Γ3 ≃ A 4, with a Higgs sector comprising a single Higgs multiplet H in the 10 fundamental representation and one Higgs field ∆ ¯ $$ \overline{\Delta } $$ in the 126 ¯ $$ \overline{\mathbf{126}} $$ for the minimal models, plus one Higgs field Σ in the 120 for the non-minimal models, all with specified modular weights. The neutrino masses are generated by the type-I and/or type II seesaw mechanisms and results are presented for each model following an intensive numerical analysis where we have optimized the free parameters of the models in order to match the experimental data. For the phenomenologically successful models, we present the best fit results in numerical tabular form as well as showing the most interesting graphical correlations between parameters, including leptonic CP phases and neutrinoless double beta decay, which have yet to be measured, leading to definite predictions for each of the models.Gui-Jun DingStephen F. KingJun-Nan LuSpringerOpenarticleBeyond Standard ModelCP violationDiscrete SymmetriesGUTNuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. RadioactivityQC770-798ENJournal of High Energy Physics, Vol 2021, Iss 11, Pp 1-42 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Beyond Standard Model CP violation Discrete Symmetries GUT Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. Radioactivity QC770-798 |
spellingShingle |
Beyond Standard Model CP violation Discrete Symmetries GUT Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. Radioactivity QC770-798 Gui-Jun Ding Stephen F. King Jun-Nan Lu SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry |
description |
Abstract We combine SO(10) Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) with A 4 modular symmetry and present a comprehensive analysis of the resulting quark and lepton mass matrices for all the simplest cases. We focus on the case where the three fermion families in the 16 dimensional spinor representation form a triplet of Γ3 ≃ A 4, with a Higgs sector comprising a single Higgs multiplet H in the 10 fundamental representation and one Higgs field ∆ ¯ $$ \overline{\Delta } $$ in the 126 ¯ $$ \overline{\mathbf{126}} $$ for the minimal models, plus one Higgs field Σ in the 120 for the non-minimal models, all with specified modular weights. The neutrino masses are generated by the type-I and/or type II seesaw mechanisms and results are presented for each model following an intensive numerical analysis where we have optimized the free parameters of the models in order to match the experimental data. For the phenomenologically successful models, we present the best fit results in numerical tabular form as well as showing the most interesting graphical correlations between parameters, including leptonic CP phases and neutrinoless double beta decay, which have yet to be measured, leading to definite predictions for each of the models. |
format |
article |
author |
Gui-Jun Ding Stephen F. King Jun-Nan Lu |
author_facet |
Gui-Jun Ding Stephen F. King Jun-Nan Lu |
author_sort |
Gui-Jun Ding |
title |
SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry |
title_short |
SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry |
title_full |
SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry |
title_fullStr |
SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry |
title_full_unstemmed |
SO(10) models with A 4 modular symmetry |
title_sort |
so(10) models with a 4 modular symmetry |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6cc7a3e08cac4d11a844ba42bf879d10 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guijunding so10modelswitha4modularsymmetry AT stephenfking so10modelswitha4modularsymmetry AT junnanlu so10modelswitha4modularsymmetry |
_version_ |
1718442245792727040 |