On the supersingular GPST attack
The main attack against static-key supersingular isogeny Diffie–Hellman (SIDH) is the Galbraith–Petit–Shani–Ti (GPST) attack, which also prevents the application of SIDH to other constructions such as non-interactive key-exchange. In this paper, we identify and study a specific assumption on which t...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6cd44119188b496ea8c3e6a069561d3e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6cd44119188b496ea8c3e6a069561d3e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6cd44119188b496ea8c3e6a069561d3e2021-12-05T14:10:52ZOn the supersingular GPST attack1862-298410.1515/jmc-2021-0020https://doaj.org/article/6cd44119188b496ea8c3e6a069561d3e2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/jmc-2021-0020https://doaj.org/toc/1862-2984The main attack against static-key supersingular isogeny Diffie–Hellman (SIDH) is the Galbraith–Petit–Shani–Ti (GPST) attack, which also prevents the application of SIDH to other constructions such as non-interactive key-exchange. In this paper, we identify and study a specific assumption on which the GPST attack relies that does not necessarily hold in all circumstances. We show that in some circumstances the attack fails to recover part of the secret key. We also characterize the conditions necessary for the attack to fail and show that it rarely happens in real cases. We give a link with collisions in the Charles-Goren-Lauter (CGL) hash function.Basso AndreaPazuki FabienDe Gruyterarticleisogeniessupersingular elliptic curvesmodular invariants14h5214k0211t7194a6081p9465p25MathematicsQA1-939ENJournal of Mathematical Cryptology, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 14-19 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
isogenies supersingular elliptic curves modular invariants 14h52 14k02 11t71 94a60 81p94 65p25 Mathematics QA1-939 |
spellingShingle |
isogenies supersingular elliptic curves modular invariants 14h52 14k02 11t71 94a60 81p94 65p25 Mathematics QA1-939 Basso Andrea Pazuki Fabien On the supersingular GPST attack |
description |
The main attack against static-key supersingular isogeny Diffie–Hellman (SIDH) is the Galbraith–Petit–Shani–Ti (GPST) attack, which also prevents the application of SIDH to other constructions such as non-interactive key-exchange. In this paper, we identify and study a specific assumption on which the GPST attack relies that does not necessarily hold in all circumstances. We show that in some circumstances the attack fails to recover part of the secret key. We also characterize the conditions necessary for the attack to fail and show that it rarely happens in real cases. We give a link with collisions in the Charles-Goren-Lauter (CGL) hash function. |
format |
article |
author |
Basso Andrea Pazuki Fabien |
author_facet |
Basso Andrea Pazuki Fabien |
author_sort |
Basso Andrea |
title |
On the supersingular GPST attack |
title_short |
On the supersingular GPST attack |
title_full |
On the supersingular GPST attack |
title_fullStr |
On the supersingular GPST attack |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the supersingular GPST attack |
title_sort |
on the supersingular gpst attack |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6cd44119188b496ea8c3e6a069561d3e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bassoandrea onthesupersingulargpstattack AT pazukifabien onthesupersingulargpstattack |
_version_ |
1718371646757142528 |