Fitness & Sportmedizin

Objectives: Elastic taping is postulated to support musculoskeletal aspects of athletic performance. Thereby, specific application techniques should affect specific aspects of muscle functioning, thus facilitating or inhibiting tonicity of the taped muscle. This study examines if different applicati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vinken PM
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
Publicado: Dynamic Media Sales Verlag 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6cdf18758a6e4d7192c1a5dbf7914642
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6cdf18758a6e4d7192c1a5dbf7914642
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6cdf18758a6e4d7192c1a5dbf79146422021-11-16T19:01:41ZFitness & Sportmedizin0344-59252510-526410.5960/dzsm.2017.313https://doaj.org/article/6cdf18758a6e4d7192c1a5dbf79146422018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2018/heft-2/performance-impairment-with-taping-objective-and-subjective-effects-of-elastic-taping-on-vertical-jump-performance/https://doaj.org/toc/0344-5925https://doaj.org/toc/2510-5264Objectives: Elastic taping is postulated to support musculoskeletal aspects of athletic performance. Thereby, specific application techniques should affect specific aspects of muscle functioning, thus facilitating or inhibiting tonicity of the taped muscle. This study examines if different application directions of elastic taping on the quadriceps femoris muscle affect vertical jump performance. Additionally, participants subjective sensation during such facilitative and inhibitory elastic tapings is investigated.Methods: 30 participants were asked to perform counter movement jumps without, with facilitative, and with inhibitory elastic taping. Tape application conditions were presented randomly. Participants were blinded concerning postulated effects and application techniques. Height of flight during counter movement jumps was measured to indicate vertical jump performance. Vertical jumps were captured with a high-speed camera. Subjective sensation was investigated using an eleven-point Likert-scale (-5=strongly impaired, 0=neither nor, +5=strongly supported) and participants were asked to evaluate elastic tape applications with regard to jump performance and overall leg sensation. Results: Both elastic tape applications impair jump performance. However, participants evaluate both applications as supportive. There is no difference between facilitative and inhibitory tape application techniques.Discussion: Hypothesized performance-enhancing effects of elastic taping on jump performance in active, healthy and young participants can be neglected. However, elastic tape applications affect participants subjective sensation, which should be considered depending on given context and intention KEY WORDS: Kinesiotaping, Counter Movement Jump, Athletic Performance, Videoanalysis, Likert-ScaleVinken PMDynamic Media Sales VerlagarticleSports medicineRC1200-1245DEENDeutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, Vol 69, Iss 2 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
topic Sports medicine
RC1200-1245
spellingShingle Sports medicine
RC1200-1245
Vinken PM
Fitness & Sportmedizin
description Objectives: Elastic taping is postulated to support musculoskeletal aspects of athletic performance. Thereby, specific application techniques should affect specific aspects of muscle functioning, thus facilitating or inhibiting tonicity of the taped muscle. This study examines if different application directions of elastic taping on the quadriceps femoris muscle affect vertical jump performance. Additionally, participants subjective sensation during such facilitative and inhibitory elastic tapings is investigated.Methods: 30 participants were asked to perform counter movement jumps without, with facilitative, and with inhibitory elastic taping. Tape application conditions were presented randomly. Participants were blinded concerning postulated effects and application techniques. Height of flight during counter movement jumps was measured to indicate vertical jump performance. Vertical jumps were captured with a high-speed camera. Subjective sensation was investigated using an eleven-point Likert-scale (-5=strongly impaired, 0=neither nor, +5=strongly supported) and participants were asked to evaluate elastic tape applications with regard to jump performance and overall leg sensation. Results: Both elastic tape applications impair jump performance. However, participants evaluate both applications as supportive. There is no difference between facilitative and inhibitory tape application techniques.Discussion: Hypothesized performance-enhancing effects of elastic taping on jump performance in active, healthy and young participants can be neglected. However, elastic tape applications affect participants subjective sensation, which should be considered depending on given context and intention KEY WORDS: Kinesiotaping, Counter Movement Jump, Athletic Performance, Videoanalysis, Likert-Scale
format article
author Vinken PM
author_facet Vinken PM
author_sort Vinken PM
title Fitness & Sportmedizin
title_short Fitness & Sportmedizin
title_full Fitness & Sportmedizin
title_fullStr Fitness & Sportmedizin
title_full_unstemmed Fitness & Sportmedizin
title_sort fitness & sportmedizin
publisher Dynamic Media Sales Verlag
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/6cdf18758a6e4d7192c1a5dbf7914642
work_keys_str_mv AT vinkenpm fitnessampsportmedizin
_version_ 1718426180341727232