Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection

Abstract Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. The goal of this me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aakash Sheth, Malak Modi, Desiree’ Dawson, Paari Dominic
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6cebe0884c9b4e399a5de50df07304c1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6cebe0884c9b4e399a5de50df07304c1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6cebe0884c9b4e399a5de50df07304c12021-12-02T13:19:22ZPrognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection10.1038/s41598-021-84643-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6cebe0884c9b4e399a5de50df07304c12021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84643-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. The goal of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding the prognostic relevance of cardiac biomarkers from data available in published reports. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception through April 2020 for studies comparing median values of cardiac biomarkers in critically ill versus non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or patients who died versus those who survived. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the groups were calculated for each study and combined using a random effects meta-analysis model. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality based on cardiac injury was combined from studies reporting it. Troponin levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients who died or were critically ill versus those who were alive or not critically ill (WMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.70, p < 0.001). Additionally, BNP levels were also significantly higher in patients who died or were critically ill (WMD 0.45, 95% CI − 0.21–0.69, p < 0.001). Cardiac injury was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 6.641, 95% CI 1.26–35.1, p = 0.03). A significant difference in levels of D-dimer was seen in those who died or were critically ill. CK levels were only significantly higher in those who died versus those who were alive (WMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.25–1.33, p = 0.004). Cardiac biomarkers add prognostic value to the determination of the severity of COVID-19 and can predict mortality.Aakash ShethMalak ModiDesiree’ DawsonPaari DominicNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Aakash Sheth
Malak Modi
Desiree’ Dawson
Paari Dominic
Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection
description Abstract Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. The goal of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding the prognostic relevance of cardiac biomarkers from data available in published reports. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception through April 2020 for studies comparing median values of cardiac biomarkers in critically ill versus non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or patients who died versus those who survived. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the groups were calculated for each study and combined using a random effects meta-analysis model. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality based on cardiac injury was combined from studies reporting it. Troponin levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients who died or were critically ill versus those who were alive or not critically ill (WMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.70, p < 0.001). Additionally, BNP levels were also significantly higher in patients who died or were critically ill (WMD 0.45, 95% CI − 0.21–0.69, p < 0.001). Cardiac injury was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 6.641, 95% CI 1.26–35.1, p = 0.03). A significant difference in levels of D-dimer was seen in those who died or were critically ill. CK levels were only significantly higher in those who died versus those who were alive (WMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.25–1.33, p = 0.004). Cardiac biomarkers add prognostic value to the determination of the severity of COVID-19 and can predict mortality.
format article
author Aakash Sheth
Malak Modi
Desiree’ Dawson
Paari Dominic
author_facet Aakash Sheth
Malak Modi
Desiree’ Dawson
Paari Dominic
author_sort Aakash Sheth
title Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection
title_short Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection
title_full Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection
title_fullStr Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 infection
title_sort prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in covid-19 infection
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6cebe0884c9b4e399a5de50df07304c1
work_keys_str_mv AT aakashsheth prognosticvalueofcardiacbiomarkersincovid19infection
AT malakmodi prognosticvalueofcardiacbiomarkersincovid19infection
AT desireedawson prognosticvalueofcardiacbiomarkersincovid19infection
AT paaridominic prognosticvalueofcardiacbiomarkersincovid19infection
_version_ 1718393278402920448