Contralateral Eye Study of Topography Guided versus Q Value Adjusted Photorefractive Keratectomy in Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
Rania E Gad,1 Mohamed Hosny,2 Rania A Ahmed,2 Ahmed M Sherif,2 Yehia Salah Eldin2 1Ophthalmology Department, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptCorrespondence: Rania E GadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Helwan University, Ain Helwan, PO Box 11795,...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6cfdd16eb73a4cf0bc05c77086527eeb |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Rania E Gad,1 Mohamed Hosny,2 Rania A Ahmed,2 Ahmed M Sherif,2 Yehia Salah Eldin2 1Ophthalmology Department, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptCorrespondence: Rania E GadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Helwan University, Ain Helwan, PO Box 11795, Cairo, EgyptEmail rania.gad@med.helwan.edu.egPurpose of the Study: To compare visual outcome, higher order aberrations (HOAs) of topography guided and Q value adjusted ablation in the fellow eye of patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.Methods: Prospective randomized controlled interventional clinical study. The eyes of 52 patients undergoing PRK for myopia and astigmatism were included, that is, 104 eyes in total. In each patient, eyes were randomly allocated to group I: one eye received topography guided PRK using Contoura ablation software, or group II: the other eye received Q value adjusted PRK using Custom Q ablation software.Follow-Up: Six months.Results: At the end of 6 months, LogMAR UDVA was − 0.04 ± 0.12 and − 0.05 ± 0.11 (p = 0.688), while LogMAR CDVA was − 0.06 ± 0.09 and − 0.06 ± 0.1 in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.972). Both groups showed a progressive oblate shift with time. This oblate shift was insignificantly less in group I by Topolyzer at 6mm, 15° and 30° at 6 months (p = 0.102, p = 0.138, p = 0.245, respectively). Topolyzer identified a significant difference between the change in coma and trefoil in both groups at 6 months (p< 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This was caused by the significant worsening of coma in group II (p< 0.001) and the significant improvement of trefoil in group I (p = 0.007). No significant difference was found between groups in the change of ISV or ABR (p = 0.955 and 0.982, respectively). Ablation depth is a significant predictor of ΔQ at 6mm, 15° and 30° (p = 0.009, 0.039 and 0, respectively). No significant difference was found in the Strehl ratio or contrast sensitivity, although they were insignificantly better in group I (p = 0.785 and p = 0.745, respectively).Conclusion: TG PRK and CQ PRK yielded similar results regarding UDVA, CDVA, MRSE, safety, predictability and contrast sensitivity. Both groups showed a progressive oblate shift, which was less in the TG group but the difference was statistically insignificant. TG PRK showed significantly improved trefoil HOA as compared to CQ PRK.Keywords: topography, Q value, photorefractive keratectomy, myopia, astigmatism |
|---|