Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region

The present study evaluated the environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage farms of different sizes by applying a set of environmental sustainability indicators and exploring benchmarks combined with the indicators. One large-scale (LS), one medium-scale (MS), and two small-scale farms (S...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naor S. Fialho, Wagner C. Valenti, Fernanda S. David, Elisa M. Godoy, Danilo C. Proença, Rodrigo Roubach, Guilherme Wolff Bueno
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6d1f73f567e7440d873af05fd2b4f6b6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6d1f73f567e7440d873af05fd2b4f6b6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6d1f73f567e7440d873af05fd2b4f6b62021-12-01T04:57:52ZEnvironmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108008https://doaj.org/article/6d1f73f567e7440d873af05fd2b4f6b62021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21006737https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThe present study evaluated the environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage farms of different sizes by applying a set of environmental sustainability indicators and exploring benchmarks combined with the indicators. One large-scale (LS), one medium-scale (MS), and two small-scale farms (SSI and SSII) placed in Southeastern Brazil were studied. Data from three batches were obtained from each farm during a production cycle, with durations ranging from 189 to 263 days, totaling twelve sample units for each variable. During fish production, samples of water, sediment, fish, feed, and greenhouse gases were collected and used to calculate the Environmental Sustainability Indicators (ESI). These indicators were grouped into five principles: the use of natural resources; efficiency in the use of resources; release of pollutants and unused by-products; pollutants accumulated on the bottom of the water body; conservation of genetic diversity and biodiversity. Each indicator was converted into a performance scale. Data of ESI obtained from each farm, and a literature review was used to develop a “standard” value, allowing the benchmarking of the environmental sustainability of the farms. The best environmentally sustainable index was obtained in the farm MS (87), followed by farm SSI (85), and the worst was farm SSII (73); farm LS achieved an index of 82. Farm SSI was positively influenced by the use of energy, nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon, which was on average 17% lower than the other farms, and by the highest efficiency in the use of nitrogen and phosphorus (32.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Farm MS was positively influenced by the lowest phosphorus accumulation and organic matter (1 and 90 kg/t, respectively). Farm SSII was negatively influenced by the high levels of accumulated phosphorus and organic matter (10 and 723 kg/t, respectively). The results showed that environmental sustainability is independent of the farm size. Other factors, such as feed composition, management techniques, and water temperature, were more critical. The use of the benchmarking tool has shown to be a way to better use ESI to assess the sustainability of aquaculture in the absence of defined endpoints for each indicator. This tool provides a reference value for each environmental sustainability indicator, allowing improvements to reach desirable states.Naor S. FialhoWagner C. ValentiFernanda S. DavidElisa M. GodoyDanilo C. ProençaRodrigo RoubachGuilherme Wolff BuenoElsevierarticleAquacultureBenchmarkingBioeconomyEnvironmental indicatorsNet-cageEnvironmental sustainabilityEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 129, Iss , Pp 108008- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Aquaculture
Benchmarking
Bioeconomy
Environmental indicators
Net-cage
Environmental sustainability
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Aquaculture
Benchmarking
Bioeconomy
Environmental indicators
Net-cage
Environmental sustainability
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Naor S. Fialho
Wagner C. Valenti
Fernanda S. David
Elisa M. Godoy
Danilo C. Proença
Rodrigo Roubach
Guilherme Wolff Bueno
Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
description The present study evaluated the environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage farms of different sizes by applying a set of environmental sustainability indicators and exploring benchmarks combined with the indicators. One large-scale (LS), one medium-scale (MS), and two small-scale farms (SSI and SSII) placed in Southeastern Brazil were studied. Data from three batches were obtained from each farm during a production cycle, with durations ranging from 189 to 263 days, totaling twelve sample units for each variable. During fish production, samples of water, sediment, fish, feed, and greenhouse gases were collected and used to calculate the Environmental Sustainability Indicators (ESI). These indicators were grouped into five principles: the use of natural resources; efficiency in the use of resources; release of pollutants and unused by-products; pollutants accumulated on the bottom of the water body; conservation of genetic diversity and biodiversity. Each indicator was converted into a performance scale. Data of ESI obtained from each farm, and a literature review was used to develop a “standard” value, allowing the benchmarking of the environmental sustainability of the farms. The best environmentally sustainable index was obtained in the farm MS (87), followed by farm SSI (85), and the worst was farm SSII (73); farm LS achieved an index of 82. Farm SSI was positively influenced by the use of energy, nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon, which was on average 17% lower than the other farms, and by the highest efficiency in the use of nitrogen and phosphorus (32.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Farm MS was positively influenced by the lowest phosphorus accumulation and organic matter (1 and 90 kg/t, respectively). Farm SSII was negatively influenced by the high levels of accumulated phosphorus and organic matter (10 and 723 kg/t, respectively). The results showed that environmental sustainability is independent of the farm size. Other factors, such as feed composition, management techniques, and water temperature, were more critical. The use of the benchmarking tool has shown to be a way to better use ESI to assess the sustainability of aquaculture in the absence of defined endpoints for each indicator. This tool provides a reference value for each environmental sustainability indicator, allowing improvements to reach desirable states.
format article
author Naor S. Fialho
Wagner C. Valenti
Fernanda S. David
Elisa M. Godoy
Danilo C. Proença
Rodrigo Roubach
Guilherme Wolff Bueno
author_facet Naor S. Fialho
Wagner C. Valenti
Fernanda S. David
Elisa M. Godoy
Danilo C. Proença
Rodrigo Roubach
Guilherme Wolff Bueno
author_sort Naor S. Fialho
title Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
title_short Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
title_full Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
title_fullStr Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
title_full_unstemmed Environmental sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
title_sort environmental sustainability of nile tilapia net-cage culture in a neotropical region
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6d1f73f567e7440d873af05fd2b4f6b6
work_keys_str_mv AT naorsfialho environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
AT wagnercvalenti environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
AT fernandasdavid environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
AT elisamgodoy environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
AT danilocproenca environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
AT rodrigoroubach environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
AT guilhermewolffbueno environmentalsustainabilityofniletilapianetcagecultureinaneotropicalregion
_version_ 1718405666001911808