What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?

Civil society groups and their members are important agents within the multi-stakeholder change process towards more ecological, social, global, and economic sustainability. To better understand civil society group members’ drivers within this complex societal change process, the present study exami...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christoph Zacher, Marieke Born, Stefan Wurster, Alexandra Michel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc32021-11-25T19:01:24ZWhat Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?10.3390/su1322124762071-1050https://doaj.org/article/6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12476https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050Civil society groups and their members are important agents within the multi-stakeholder change process towards more ecological, social, global, and economic sustainability. To better understand civil society group members’ drivers within this complex societal change process, the present study examines the impact of perceived participation, leader–member exchange (LMX), procedural justice, and procedural justice climate on change-supporting behavior. Referring to social exchange theory, data from 125 members of 34 civil society groups that engage in the Agenda 21 process in Germany were gathered by paper/pencil and online questionnaires. Multi-level analyses were conducted to examine interactions between group-level and individual-level phenomena. We found that participation and LMX positively affected group members’ procedural justice perceptions and that procedural justice positively affected group members’ change-supporting behavior. Procedural justice further mediated the relationship between participation, LMX, and change-supporting behavior. The study’s results suggest that fair social exchange processes with civil society group members should be more encouraged by other societal stakeholders (i.e., government, civil society group leaders) wishing to maximize civil society group members’ change-supporting behavior. This study demonstrates ways to promote change initiatives in civil society. Fair social exchange processes help to overcome participation hurdles in the complex field of sustainable local development.Christoph ZacherMarieke BornStefan WursterAlexandra MichelMDPI AGarticlesustainabilitysocial changeprocedural justicecivil societyagenda 21 processleadershipEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12476, p 12476 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic sustainability
social change
procedural justice
civil society
agenda 21 process
leadership
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle sustainability
social change
procedural justice
civil society
agenda 21 process
leadership
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Christoph Zacher
Marieke Born
Stefan Wurster
Alexandra Michel
What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
description Civil society groups and their members are important agents within the multi-stakeholder change process towards more ecological, social, global, and economic sustainability. To better understand civil society group members’ drivers within this complex societal change process, the present study examines the impact of perceived participation, leader–member exchange (LMX), procedural justice, and procedural justice climate on change-supporting behavior. Referring to social exchange theory, data from 125 members of 34 civil society groups that engage in the Agenda 21 process in Germany were gathered by paper/pencil and online questionnaires. Multi-level analyses were conducted to examine interactions between group-level and individual-level phenomena. We found that participation and LMX positively affected group members’ procedural justice perceptions and that procedural justice positively affected group members’ change-supporting behavior. Procedural justice further mediated the relationship between participation, LMX, and change-supporting behavior. The study’s results suggest that fair social exchange processes with civil society group members should be more encouraged by other societal stakeholders (i.e., government, civil society group leaders) wishing to maximize civil society group members’ change-supporting behavior. This study demonstrates ways to promote change initiatives in civil society. Fair social exchange processes help to overcome participation hurdles in the complex field of sustainable local development.
format article
author Christoph Zacher
Marieke Born
Stefan Wurster
Alexandra Michel
author_facet Christoph Zacher
Marieke Born
Stefan Wurster
Alexandra Michel
author_sort Christoph Zacher
title What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
title_short What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
title_full What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
title_fullStr What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
title_full_unstemmed What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
title_sort what explains change-supporting behavior within local agenda 21 civil society groups to promote sustainable development?
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc3
work_keys_str_mv AT christophzacher whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment
AT mariekeborn whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment
AT stefanwurster whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment
AT alexandramichel whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment
_version_ 1718410407719206912