What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?
Civil society groups and their members are important agents within the multi-stakeholder change process towards more ecological, social, global, and economic sustainability. To better understand civil society group members’ drivers within this complex societal change process, the present study exami...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc32021-11-25T19:01:24ZWhat Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development?10.3390/su1322124762071-1050https://doaj.org/article/6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12476https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050Civil society groups and their members are important agents within the multi-stakeholder change process towards more ecological, social, global, and economic sustainability. To better understand civil society group members’ drivers within this complex societal change process, the present study examines the impact of perceived participation, leader–member exchange (LMX), procedural justice, and procedural justice climate on change-supporting behavior. Referring to social exchange theory, data from 125 members of 34 civil society groups that engage in the Agenda 21 process in Germany were gathered by paper/pencil and online questionnaires. Multi-level analyses were conducted to examine interactions between group-level and individual-level phenomena. We found that participation and LMX positively affected group members’ procedural justice perceptions and that procedural justice positively affected group members’ change-supporting behavior. Procedural justice further mediated the relationship between participation, LMX, and change-supporting behavior. The study’s results suggest that fair social exchange processes with civil society group members should be more encouraged by other societal stakeholders (i.e., government, civil society group leaders) wishing to maximize civil society group members’ change-supporting behavior. This study demonstrates ways to promote change initiatives in civil society. Fair social exchange processes help to overcome participation hurdles in the complex field of sustainable local development.Christoph ZacherMarieke BornStefan WursterAlexandra MichelMDPI AGarticlesustainabilitysocial changeprocedural justicecivil societyagenda 21 processleadershipEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12476, p 12476 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
sustainability social change procedural justice civil society agenda 21 process leadership Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
sustainability social change procedural justice civil society agenda 21 process leadership Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Christoph Zacher Marieke Born Stefan Wurster Alexandra Michel What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development? |
description |
Civil society groups and their members are important agents within the multi-stakeholder change process towards more ecological, social, global, and economic sustainability. To better understand civil society group members’ drivers within this complex societal change process, the present study examines the impact of perceived participation, leader–member exchange (LMX), procedural justice, and procedural justice climate on change-supporting behavior. Referring to social exchange theory, data from 125 members of 34 civil society groups that engage in the Agenda 21 process in Germany were gathered by paper/pencil and online questionnaires. Multi-level analyses were conducted to examine interactions between group-level and individual-level phenomena. We found that participation and LMX positively affected group members’ procedural justice perceptions and that procedural justice positively affected group members’ change-supporting behavior. Procedural justice further mediated the relationship between participation, LMX, and change-supporting behavior. The study’s results suggest that fair social exchange processes with civil society group members should be more encouraged by other societal stakeholders (i.e., government, civil society group leaders) wishing to maximize civil society group members’ change-supporting behavior. This study demonstrates ways to promote change initiatives in civil society. Fair social exchange processes help to overcome participation hurdles in the complex field of sustainable local development. |
format |
article |
author |
Christoph Zacher Marieke Born Stefan Wurster Alexandra Michel |
author_facet |
Christoph Zacher Marieke Born Stefan Wurster Alexandra Michel |
author_sort |
Christoph Zacher |
title |
What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development? |
title_short |
What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development? |
title_full |
What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development? |
title_fullStr |
What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Explains Change-Supporting Behavior within Local Agenda 21 Civil Society Groups to Promote Sustainable Development? |
title_sort |
what explains change-supporting behavior within local agenda 21 civil society groups to promote sustainable development? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6d2d47bd8fad4afbb86f16db88dfddc3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christophzacher whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment AT mariekeborn whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment AT stefanwurster whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment AT alexandramichel whatexplainschangesupportingbehaviorwithinlocalagenda21civilsocietygroupstopromotesustainabledevelopment |
_version_ |
1718410407719206912 |