Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone

For renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuels, large scale energy storage is required and thermal batteries have been identified as a commercially viable option. In this study, a 3.2 kg prototype (0.82 kWhth) of the limestone-based CaCO3-Al2O3 (16.7 wt%) thermochemical energy storage system w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasper T. Møller, Terry D. Humphries, Amanda Berger, Mark Paskevicius, Craig E. Buckley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6d39755860ab46de99d093ebb266f926
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6d39755860ab46de99d093ebb266f926
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6d39755860ab46de99d093ebb266f9262021-11-18T04:53:00ZThermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone2666-821110.1016/j.ceja.2021.100168https://doaj.org/article/6d39755860ab46de99d093ebb266f9262021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666821121000843https://doaj.org/toc/2666-8211For renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuels, large scale energy storage is required and thermal batteries have been identified as a commercially viable option. In this study, a 3.2 kg prototype (0.82 kWhth) of the limestone-based CaCO3-Al2O3 (16.7 wt%) thermochemical energy storage system was investigated near 900 °C in three different configurations: (i) CaCO3 was thermally cycled between 850 °C during carbonation and 950 °C during calcination whilst activated carbon was utilised as a CO2 gas storage material. (ii) The CaCO3 temperature was kept constant at 900 °C while utilising the activated carbon gas storage method to drive the thermochemical reaction. (iii) A mechanical gas compressor was used to compress CO2 into volumetric gas bottles to achieve a significant under/overpressure upon calcination/carbonation, i.e. ≤ 0.8 bar and > 5 bar, respectively, compared to the ∼1 bar thermodynamic equilibrium pressure at 900 °C. Scenarios (i) and (iii) showed a 64% energy capacity retention at the end of the 10th cycle. The decrease in capacity was partly assigned to the formation of mayenite, Ca12Al14O33, and thus the absence of the beneficial properties of the expected Ca5Al6O14 while sintering was also observed. The 316L stainless-steel reactor was investigated in regards to corrosion issues after being under CO2 atmosphere above 850 °C for approximately 1400 h, and showed no significant degradation. This study illustrates the potential for industrial scale up of catalysed CaCO3 as a thermal battery and provides a viable alternative to the calcium-looping process.Kasper T. MøllerTerry D. HumphriesAmanda BergerMark PaskeviciusCraig E. BuckleyElsevierarticleThermochemical energy storageLimestoneEnergy storage setupsCalcium-looping alternativeScale-upThermal energy storage prototypeChemical engineeringTP155-156ENChemical Engineering Journal Advances, Vol 8, Iss , Pp 100168- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Thermochemical energy storage
Limestone
Energy storage setups
Calcium-looping alternative
Scale-up
Thermal energy storage prototype
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
spellingShingle Thermochemical energy storage
Limestone
Energy storage setups
Calcium-looping alternative
Scale-up
Thermal energy storage prototype
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Kasper T. Møller
Terry D. Humphries
Amanda Berger
Mark Paskevicius
Craig E. Buckley
Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
description For renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuels, large scale energy storage is required and thermal batteries have been identified as a commercially viable option. In this study, a 3.2 kg prototype (0.82 kWhth) of the limestone-based CaCO3-Al2O3 (16.7 wt%) thermochemical energy storage system was investigated near 900 °C in three different configurations: (i) CaCO3 was thermally cycled between 850 °C during carbonation and 950 °C during calcination whilst activated carbon was utilised as a CO2 gas storage material. (ii) The CaCO3 temperature was kept constant at 900 °C while utilising the activated carbon gas storage method to drive the thermochemical reaction. (iii) A mechanical gas compressor was used to compress CO2 into volumetric gas bottles to achieve a significant under/overpressure upon calcination/carbonation, i.e. ≤ 0.8 bar and > 5 bar, respectively, compared to the ∼1 bar thermodynamic equilibrium pressure at 900 °C. Scenarios (i) and (iii) showed a 64% energy capacity retention at the end of the 10th cycle. The decrease in capacity was partly assigned to the formation of mayenite, Ca12Al14O33, and thus the absence of the beneficial properties of the expected Ca5Al6O14 while sintering was also observed. The 316L stainless-steel reactor was investigated in regards to corrosion issues after being under CO2 atmosphere above 850 °C for approximately 1400 h, and showed no significant degradation. This study illustrates the potential for industrial scale up of catalysed CaCO3 as a thermal battery and provides a viable alternative to the calcium-looping process.
format article
author Kasper T. Møller
Terry D. Humphries
Amanda Berger
Mark Paskevicius
Craig E. Buckley
author_facet Kasper T. Møller
Terry D. Humphries
Amanda Berger
Mark Paskevicius
Craig E. Buckley
author_sort Kasper T. Møller
title Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
title_short Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
title_full Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
title_fullStr Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
title_full_unstemmed Thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
title_sort thermochemical energy storage system development utilising limestone
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6d39755860ab46de99d093ebb266f926
work_keys_str_mv AT kaspertmøller thermochemicalenergystoragesystemdevelopmentutilisinglimestone
AT terrydhumphries thermochemicalenergystoragesystemdevelopmentutilisinglimestone
AT amandaberger thermochemicalenergystoragesystemdevelopmentutilisinglimestone
AT markpaskevicius thermochemicalenergystoragesystemdevelopmentutilisinglimestone
AT craigebuckley thermochemicalenergystoragesystemdevelopmentutilisinglimestone
_version_ 1718424980549533696