Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy

Over the past decades, the Netherlands has witnessed the rise of several influential populist radical right parties, including the Pim Fortuyn List (Lijst Pim Fortuyn), Geert Wilders’s Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid) and, more recently, the Forum for Democracy (Forum voor Democratie [FvD...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Léonie de Jonge
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Cogitatio 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6d423b1ee1e74eb786a7ae0f159c306a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6d423b1ee1e74eb786a7ae0f159c306a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6d423b1ee1e74eb786a7ae0f159c306a2021-11-24T11:48:17ZIs the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy2183-246310.17645/pag.v9i4.4525https://doaj.org/article/6d423b1ee1e74eb786a7ae0f159c306a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4525https://doaj.org/toc/2183-2463Over the past decades, the Netherlands has witnessed the rise of several influential populist radical right parties, including the Pim Fortuyn List (Lijst Pim Fortuyn), Geert Wilders’s Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid) and, more recently, the Forum for Democracy (Forum voor Democratie [FvD]). By analyzing the party’s organizational structures, this article seeks to determine whether the FvD may be considered a new “mass party” and to what extent ordinary members can exert influence over the party’s internal procedures. The party’s efforts to establish a large membership base suggest that the FvD set out to build a relatively complex mass organization. Through targeted advertising campaigns, the party made strategic use of social media platforms to rally support. Thus, while the means may have changed with the advent of the internet, the FvD invested in creating some organizational features that are commonly associated with the “mass party” model. At the same time, however, the party did not really seek to foster a community of loyal partisan activists among its membership base but instead treated its members as donors. The party is clearly characterized by centralized leadership in the sense that the party’s spearhead, Thierry Baudet, maintains full control over key decision-making areas such as ideological direction, campaigning, and internal procedures. At first sight, the party appears to have departed from Wilders’s leader-centered party model. However, a closer look at the party apparatus demonstrates that the FvD is, in fact, very hierarchical, suggesting that the party’s internal democracy is much weaker than the party’s name might suggest.Léonie de JongeCogitatioarticleforum for democracymass partiesparty organizationpopulist radical rightthe netherlandsPolitical science (General)JA1-92ENPolitics and Governance, Vol 9, Iss 4, Pp 286-295 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic forum for democracy
mass parties
party organization
populist radical right
the netherlands
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle forum for democracy
mass parties
party organization
populist radical right
the netherlands
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Léonie de Jonge
Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy
description Over the past decades, the Netherlands has witnessed the rise of several influential populist radical right parties, including the Pim Fortuyn List (Lijst Pim Fortuyn), Geert Wilders’s Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid) and, more recently, the Forum for Democracy (Forum voor Democratie [FvD]). By analyzing the party’s organizational structures, this article seeks to determine whether the FvD may be considered a new “mass party” and to what extent ordinary members can exert influence over the party’s internal procedures. The party’s efforts to establish a large membership base suggest that the FvD set out to build a relatively complex mass organization. Through targeted advertising campaigns, the party made strategic use of social media platforms to rally support. Thus, while the means may have changed with the advent of the internet, the FvD invested in creating some organizational features that are commonly associated with the “mass party” model. At the same time, however, the party did not really seek to foster a community of loyal partisan activists among its membership base but instead treated its members as donors. The party is clearly characterized by centralized leadership in the sense that the party’s spearhead, Thierry Baudet, maintains full control over key decision-making areas such as ideological direction, campaigning, and internal procedures. At first sight, the party appears to have departed from Wilders’s leader-centered party model. However, a closer look at the party apparatus demonstrates that the FvD is, in fact, very hierarchical, suggesting that the party’s internal democracy is much weaker than the party’s name might suggest.
format article
author Léonie de Jonge
author_facet Léonie de Jonge
author_sort Léonie de Jonge
title Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy
title_short Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy
title_full Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy
title_fullStr Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy
title_full_unstemmed Is the (Mass) Party Really Over? The Case of the Dutch Forum for Democracy
title_sort is the (mass) party really over? the case of the dutch forum for democracy
publisher Cogitatio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6d423b1ee1e74eb786a7ae0f159c306a
work_keys_str_mv AT leoniedejonge isthemasspartyreallyoverthecaseofthedutchforumfordemocracy
_version_ 1718415053999308800