The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States

Abstract Background Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has l...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei Jiang, Rainer Marggraf
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f62021-11-21T12:30:45ZThe origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States10.1186/s12962-021-00330-31478-7547https://doaj.org/article/6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00330-3https://doaj.org/toc/1478-7547Abstract Background Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has long been subject to neglect. We attempt to fill this gap and clarify the origin and the early development of CBA. Methods A comparative analysis is used to investigate the origin and the early development of CBA in France and the USA. The comparison is focused on two questions: (1) which criteria should be applied to decide whether or not a project should be carried out, and (2) with which procedure these criteria can be used for real projects. Results The origin of CBA can be dated back to the work of Saint-Pierre in France in 1708. Dupuit introduces the concept of consumer’s surplus that founds the economic basis of CBA. These works are not taken seriously in France and do not draw attention from other countries. Hence, until the 1930s, the principle of CBA is newly proposed in the US and the Green Book marks the mature of CBA. Conclusions The early development of CBA in France and the US is independent from the aspects of historical background, personnel, approaches and standardization. This study could help researchers of various disciplines be sure about the history of CBA when they perform this analysis in their research areas.Wei JiangRainer MarggrafBMCarticleHistoryEarly developmentCost–benefit analysisFranceUnited StatesMedicine (General)R5-920ENCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic History
Early development
Cost–benefit analysis
France
United States
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle History
Early development
Cost–benefit analysis
France
United States
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Wei Jiang
Rainer Marggraf
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
description Abstract Background Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has long been subject to neglect. We attempt to fill this gap and clarify the origin and the early development of CBA. Methods A comparative analysis is used to investigate the origin and the early development of CBA in France and the USA. The comparison is focused on two questions: (1) which criteria should be applied to decide whether or not a project should be carried out, and (2) with which procedure these criteria can be used for real projects. Results The origin of CBA can be dated back to the work of Saint-Pierre in France in 1708. Dupuit introduces the concept of consumer’s surplus that founds the economic basis of CBA. These works are not taken seriously in France and do not draw attention from other countries. Hence, until the 1930s, the principle of CBA is newly proposed in the US and the Green Book marks the mature of CBA. Conclusions The early development of CBA in France and the US is independent from the aspects of historical background, personnel, approaches and standardization. This study could help researchers of various disciplines be sure about the history of CBA when they perform this analysis in their research areas.
format article
author Wei Jiang
Rainer Marggraf
author_facet Wei Jiang
Rainer Marggraf
author_sort Wei Jiang
title The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
title_short The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
title_full The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
title_fullStr The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
title_full_unstemmed The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
title_sort origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of france and the united states
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f6
work_keys_str_mv AT weijiang theoriginofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates
AT rainermarggraf theoriginofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates
AT weijiang originofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates
AT rainermarggraf originofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates
_version_ 1718418950220414976