The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
Abstract Background Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has l...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f6 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f6 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f62021-11-21T12:30:45ZThe origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States10.1186/s12962-021-00330-31478-7547https://doaj.org/article/6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00330-3https://doaj.org/toc/1478-7547Abstract Background Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has long been subject to neglect. We attempt to fill this gap and clarify the origin and the early development of CBA. Methods A comparative analysis is used to investigate the origin and the early development of CBA in France and the USA. The comparison is focused on two questions: (1) which criteria should be applied to decide whether or not a project should be carried out, and (2) with which procedure these criteria can be used for real projects. Results The origin of CBA can be dated back to the work of Saint-Pierre in France in 1708. Dupuit introduces the concept of consumer’s surplus that founds the economic basis of CBA. These works are not taken seriously in France and do not draw attention from other countries. Hence, until the 1930s, the principle of CBA is newly proposed in the US and the Green Book marks the mature of CBA. Conclusions The early development of CBA in France and the US is independent from the aspects of historical background, personnel, approaches and standardization. This study could help researchers of various disciplines be sure about the history of CBA when they perform this analysis in their research areas.Wei JiangRainer MarggrafBMCarticleHistoryEarly developmentCost–benefit analysisFranceUnited StatesMedicine (General)R5-920ENCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
History Early development Cost–benefit analysis France United States Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
History Early development Cost–benefit analysis France United States Medicine (General) R5-920 Wei Jiang Rainer Marggraf The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States |
description |
Abstract Background Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has long been subject to neglect. We attempt to fill this gap and clarify the origin and the early development of CBA. Methods A comparative analysis is used to investigate the origin and the early development of CBA in France and the USA. The comparison is focused on two questions: (1) which criteria should be applied to decide whether or not a project should be carried out, and (2) with which procedure these criteria can be used for real projects. Results The origin of CBA can be dated back to the work of Saint-Pierre in France in 1708. Dupuit introduces the concept of consumer’s surplus that founds the economic basis of CBA. These works are not taken seriously in France and do not draw attention from other countries. Hence, until the 1930s, the principle of CBA is newly proposed in the US and the Green Book marks the mature of CBA. Conclusions The early development of CBA in France and the US is independent from the aspects of historical background, personnel, approaches and standardization. This study could help researchers of various disciplines be sure about the history of CBA when they perform this analysis in their research areas. |
format |
article |
author |
Wei Jiang Rainer Marggraf |
author_facet |
Wei Jiang Rainer Marggraf |
author_sort |
Wei Jiang |
title |
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States |
title_short |
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States |
title_full |
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States |
title_fullStr |
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States |
title_full_unstemmed |
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States |
title_sort |
origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of france and the united states |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6d5b774e98dc4c559efb9baac7e381f6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weijiang theoriginofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates AT rainermarggraf theoriginofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates AT weijiang originofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates AT rainermarggraf originofcostbenefitanalysisacomparativeviewoffranceandtheunitedstates |
_version_ |
1718418950220414976 |