Editorial

A common accusation made by Muslims is that the West disrespects Islam and employs a double standard when dealing with them. It is so easy to find instances of hypocrisy that one may reasonably argue that it is the West’s default response to Muslims (e.g., saying it supports democracy while financi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katherine Bullock
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6d6f80bee527451198b0e6854214b9c1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6d6f80bee527451198b0e6854214b9c1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6d6f80bee527451198b0e6854214b9c12021-12-02T19:41:16ZEditorial10.35632/ajis.v25i2.14712690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/6d6f80bee527451198b0e6854214b9c12008-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1471https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 A common accusation made by Muslims is that the West disrespects Islam and employs a double standard when dealing with them. It is so easy to find instances of hypocrisy that one may reasonably argue that it is the West’s default response to Muslims (e.g., saying it supports democracy while financing authoritarian regimes, or saying Islam oppresses women while overlooking the prevalence of sexual harassment against women in the western workforce.) In his “Clash of Civilizations” article, Samuel Huntington argued that such double standards are an inevitable result of the “kin-country syndrome”: “Aworld of clashing civilizations…is inevitably a world of double standards: people apply one standard to their kin-countries and a different standard to others.”1 So, Muslims should not complain about such western double standards as sanctioning Iraq for failing to comply with United Nations resolutions (he was writing in the 1990s) while ignoring the same failure when it comes to Israel.2 His idea of a kin-based double standard has parallels in other cultures, of course, as reflected in theArab proverb “Myself againstmy brother;my brother andmyself againstmy cousin; andmy cousin, my brother, and myself against the foreigner.” Sacrificing justice for all in the name of protecting oneself and one’s “kin” is both blameworthy and a source of tension in today’s international system. It is also connected to a simplistic western understanding ofMuslims and the internal and external challenges they face as a community. Both of these lead to negative judgments of Muslims and Muslim cultures. To explain. In his article, Huntington went on, famously, to propose that as the United States moved into sole superpower status and as the West’s “victory” in the cold war demonstrated that the western liberal capitalist model was the best political system, the coming age would be marked by wars sparked by civilizational differences instead of ideology. “Islam”was singled out as a civilization most likely to cause wars, due to certain aspects of its essential nature (“Islam has bloody borders [p. 35].)” He posited a dyadic relationship between the West and Islam: whereas western values were laudable, they were missing in Islam, for ... Katherine BullockInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 25, Iss 2 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Katherine Bullock
Editorial
description A common accusation made by Muslims is that the West disrespects Islam and employs a double standard when dealing with them. It is so easy to find instances of hypocrisy that one may reasonably argue that it is the West’s default response to Muslims (e.g., saying it supports democracy while financing authoritarian regimes, or saying Islam oppresses women while overlooking the prevalence of sexual harassment against women in the western workforce.) In his “Clash of Civilizations” article, Samuel Huntington argued that such double standards are an inevitable result of the “kin-country syndrome”: “Aworld of clashing civilizations…is inevitably a world of double standards: people apply one standard to their kin-countries and a different standard to others.”1 So, Muslims should not complain about such western double standards as sanctioning Iraq for failing to comply with United Nations resolutions (he was writing in the 1990s) while ignoring the same failure when it comes to Israel.2 His idea of a kin-based double standard has parallels in other cultures, of course, as reflected in theArab proverb “Myself againstmy brother;my brother andmyself againstmy cousin; andmy cousin, my brother, and myself against the foreigner.” Sacrificing justice for all in the name of protecting oneself and one’s “kin” is both blameworthy and a source of tension in today’s international system. It is also connected to a simplistic western understanding ofMuslims and the internal and external challenges they face as a community. Both of these lead to negative judgments of Muslims and Muslim cultures. To explain. In his article, Huntington went on, famously, to propose that as the United States moved into sole superpower status and as the West’s “victory” in the cold war demonstrated that the western liberal capitalist model was the best political system, the coming age would be marked by wars sparked by civilizational differences instead of ideology. “Islam”was singled out as a civilization most likely to cause wars, due to certain aspects of its essential nature (“Islam has bloody borders [p. 35].)” He posited a dyadic relationship between the West and Islam: whereas western values were laudable, they were missing in Islam, for ...
format article
author Katherine Bullock
author_facet Katherine Bullock
author_sort Katherine Bullock
title Editorial
title_short Editorial
title_full Editorial
title_fullStr Editorial
title_full_unstemmed Editorial
title_sort editorial
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/6d6f80bee527451198b0e6854214b9c1
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinebullock editorial
_version_ 1718376207651700736