PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview

Background: A large number of protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigoro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haiyin Hu, Zhaochen Ji, Chaonan Feng, Wentai Pang, Zhe Chen, Junhua Zhang, Hui Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6dafebcee8884573bac4c1174cb823ac
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6dafebcee8884573bac4c1174cb823ac
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6dafebcee8884573bac4c1174cb823ac2021-12-04T04:34:07ZPROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview2213-422010.1016/j.imr.2021.100774https://doaj.org/article/6dafebcee8884573bac4c1174cb823ac2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422021000615https://doaj.org/toc/2213-4220Background: A large number of protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigorousness of the SR protocols and make recommendations for the design and implementation of future SRs on TCM for COVID-19. This effort is likely to enhance the value of the produced information and prevent the futility of the research. Methods: PROSPERO was searched comprehensively for identifying SRs of TCM for COVID-19 from the inception of the database to August 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and cross-checked the retrieved information for consistency. The following details were recorded: database, registration time, organizations, types of research included, participants, interventions, and outcome measures. All extracted data were analyzed by an overview. The “P - participants, I - interventions, C - controls, and O - outcomes (PICO)” included in the protocols were compared for similarity. The outcomes of the included SR protocols were compared with the newly published Core Outcome Sets (COSs). Results: A total of 80 protocols of SR related to TCM for COVID-19 were obtained after a primary search, and finally 71 protocols were included. The majority of the protocols were from China. Thirty-two organizations participated in the protocol registrations, including 11 hospitals and 21 universities/colleges. However, some protocols were not innovative or rigorous enough, as the PICO of some protocols were similar and non-specific, and the searched literature was incomprehensive. In addition, COS is not commonly adopted. Conclusions: Registering a protocol of SR is an effective way to ensure the usefulness of the produced information, and to avoid the duplication of research and the wastage of resources. In future SR protocols, it is important to focus on and solve the methodological problems such as non-specific PICO, incomprehensive literature retrieval, and improper outcome measures.Haiyin HuZhaochen JiChaonan FengWentai PangZhe ChenJunhua ZhangHui WangElsevierarticleProtocol of Systematic ReviewCOVID-19Traditional Chinese MedicinePROSPEROOverviewCore Outcome SetMiscellaneous systems and treatmentsRZ409.7-999ENIntegrative Medicine Research, Vol 10, Iss , Pp 100774- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Protocol of Systematic Review
COVID-19
Traditional Chinese Medicine
PROSPERO
Overview
Core Outcome Set
Miscellaneous systems and treatments
RZ409.7-999
spellingShingle Protocol of Systematic Review
COVID-19
Traditional Chinese Medicine
PROSPERO
Overview
Core Outcome Set
Miscellaneous systems and treatments
RZ409.7-999
Haiyin Hu
Zhaochen Ji
Chaonan Feng
Wentai Pang
Zhe Chen
Junhua Zhang
Hui Wang
PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
description Background: A large number of protocols for Systematic Reviews (SR) of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study aimed to analyze the innovativeness and rigorousness of the SR protocols and make recommendations for the design and implementation of future SRs on TCM for COVID-19. This effort is likely to enhance the value of the produced information and prevent the futility of the research. Methods: PROSPERO was searched comprehensively for identifying SRs of TCM for COVID-19 from the inception of the database to August 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and cross-checked the retrieved information for consistency. The following details were recorded: database, registration time, organizations, types of research included, participants, interventions, and outcome measures. All extracted data were analyzed by an overview. The “P - participants, I - interventions, C - controls, and O - outcomes (PICO)” included in the protocols were compared for similarity. The outcomes of the included SR protocols were compared with the newly published Core Outcome Sets (COSs). Results: A total of 80 protocols of SR related to TCM for COVID-19 were obtained after a primary search, and finally 71 protocols were included. The majority of the protocols were from China. Thirty-two organizations participated in the protocol registrations, including 11 hospitals and 21 universities/colleges. However, some protocols were not innovative or rigorous enough, as the PICO of some protocols were similar and non-specific, and the searched literature was incomprehensive. In addition, COS is not commonly adopted. Conclusions: Registering a protocol of SR is an effective way to ensure the usefulness of the produced information, and to avoid the duplication of research and the wastage of resources. In future SR protocols, it is important to focus on and solve the methodological problems such as non-specific PICO, incomprehensive literature retrieval, and improper outcome measures.
format article
author Haiyin Hu
Zhaochen Ji
Chaonan Feng
Wentai Pang
Zhe Chen
Junhua Zhang
Hui Wang
author_facet Haiyin Hu
Zhaochen Ji
Chaonan Feng
Wentai Pang
Zhe Chen
Junhua Zhang
Hui Wang
author_sort Haiyin Hu
title PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_short PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_full PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_fullStr PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_full_unstemmed PROSPERO's systematic review protocols of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: An overview
title_sort prospero's systematic review protocols of traditional chinese medicine for covid-19: an overview
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6dafebcee8884573bac4c1174cb823ac
work_keys_str_mv AT haiyinhu prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT zhaochenji prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT chaonanfeng prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT wentaipang prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT zhechen prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT junhuazhang prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
AT huiwang prosperossystematicreviewprotocolsoftraditionalchinesemedicineforcovid19anoverview
_version_ 1718372973450100736