Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications

Spirit possession, in its many forms, represents an important factor in numerous religions and cults throughout the world. In the international context, work on spirit possession is abundant, and theories and their implications have been developed based on rich and lively ethnographic material gathe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Danijel Sinani
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR SR
Publicado:	University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:	Anthropology GN1-890
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6dc22c9af4dc46d1a53ad9a3796c8f96
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6dc22c9af4dc46d1a53ad9a3796c8f96
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6dc22c9af4dc46d1a53ad9a3796c8f962021-12-02T01:21:48ZAnthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/6dc22c9af4dc46d1a53ad9a3796c8f962016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/448https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801Spirit possession, in its many forms, represents an important factor in numerous religions and cults throughout the world. In the international context, work on spirit possession is abundant, and theories and their implications have been developed based on rich and lively ethnographic material gathered in many cultures. Unfortunately, in the context of national disciplinary production, this phenomenon was not thoroughly researched in anthropological circles. The most significant researcher of the problem of spirit possession and its social consequences is undisputedly British social anthropologist A.M. Lewis. Lewis introduced concepts such as peripheral and central possession to the study of spirit possession; he offered classification of different types of possession; and demonstrated that this phenomenon represents, for those who are in any way marginalized or disempowered, a rare opportunity to draw attention to their problems and a channel of vertical social mobility. Apart from the wide recognition and publicity it acquired, Lewis’ work also attracted a number of criticisms from authors of different background, but those criticisms are mostly poorly argumented or fail to take into account the additions and elaborations of results offered by Lewis himself. In the past decades, the problem of spirit possession has been approached from various points of view; ethnographies were filled with new examples; its various functions discovered in societies where it plays a significant role; and different theoretical and methodological approaches developed. Among the most significant contributions to the study of this phenomenon are those offered by authors such as Gellner, Gomm, Giles and Lambeck. However, after years of studying this phenomenon, we can conclude that even authors who claimed to be making a qualitative leap from A.M. Lewis’ approach just, in fact, applied his premises on new ethnographic material, and occasionally pointed to new functions or roles this phenomenon can assume in different communities.Danijel SinaniUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 1, Iss 2, Pp 59-78 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR SR
topic	Anthropology GN1-890
spellingShingle	Anthropology GN1-890 Danijel Sinani Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications
description	Spirit possession, in its many forms, represents an important factor in numerous religions and cults throughout the world. In the international context, work on spirit possession is abundant, and theories and their implications have been developed based on rich and lively ethnographic material gathered in many cultures. Unfortunately, in the context of national disciplinary production, this phenomenon was not thoroughly researched in anthropological circles. The most significant researcher of the problem of spirit possession and its social consequences is undisputedly British social anthropologist A.M. Lewis. Lewis introduced concepts such as peripheral and central possession to the study of spirit possession; he offered classification of different types of possession; and demonstrated that this phenomenon represents, for those who are in any way marginalized or disempowered, a rare opportunity to draw attention to their problems and a channel of vertical social mobility. Apart from the wide recognition and publicity it acquired, Lewis’ work also attracted a number of criticisms from authors of different background, but those criticisms are mostly poorly argumented or fail to take into account the additions and elaborations of results offered by Lewis himself. In the past decades, the problem of spirit possession has been approached from various points of view; ethnographies were filled with new examples; its various functions discovered in societies where it plays a significant role; and different theoretical and methodological approaches developed. Among the most significant contributions to the study of this phenomenon are those offered by authors such as Gellner, Gomm, Giles and Lambeck. However, after years of studying this phenomenon, we can conclude that even authors who claimed to be making a qualitative leap from A.M. Lewis’ approach just, in fact, applied his premises on new ethnographic material, and occasionally pointed to new functions or roles this phenomenon can assume in different communities.
format	article
author	Danijel Sinani
author_facet	Danijel Sinani
author_sort	Danijel Sinani
title	Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications
title_short	Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications
title_full	Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications
title_fullStr	Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications
title_full_unstemmed	Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications
title_sort	anthropological research of the phenomenon of spirit possession:social aspects and implications
publisher	University of Belgrade
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/6dc22c9af4dc46d1a53ad9a3796c8f96
work_keys_str_mv	AT danijelsinani anthropologicalresearchofthephenomenonofspiritpossessionsocialaspectsandimplications
_version_	1718403142476890112

Anthropological Research of the Phenomenon of Spirit Possession:Social Aspects and Implications

Ejemplares similares