European Virtual Politics

Hooghe and Marks’ update of Rokkanian European cleavages recognises the existence of a European political arena with opposite poles. The paper first contrasts rhetorics on a European level by two European Council members at opposite poles, the French President E. Macron and the Hungarian President...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: German Carboni
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2019
Materias:
EU
Law
K
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6dea1494f54e462b9de39516b86924a0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6dea1494f54e462b9de39516b86924a0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6dea1494f54e462b9de39516b86924a02021-11-27T13:12:51ZEuropean Virtual Politics10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.63.101733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/6dea1494f54e462b9de39516b86924a02019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/1310https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 Hooghe and Marks’ update of Rokkanian European cleavages recognises the existence of a European political arena with opposite poles. The paper first contrasts rhetorics on a European level by two European Council members at opposite poles, the French President E. Macron and the Hungarian President V. Orbán, then it compares their immigration policies on a national level. While a vast difference can be detected in the rhetorical dimension, their national regulations and executive decisions on immigration are stunningly similar. Such discrepancies are explained through an institutional analysis of the European Council, which gives structural incentives to perform “virtual politics” consisting of statements aimed at gathering domestic support against virtual “opponents”, while avoiding any political risky decisions at home. Furthermore, as theneoliberal nature of the EU incentivizes the status quo in this area, only pro-found institutional reform can lay the ground for a change. German CarboniKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleImmigrationEuropean CouncilVirtual PoliticEULawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 16, Iss 6(63) (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
topic Immigration
European Council
Virtual Politic
EU
Law
K
Political science
J
spellingShingle Immigration
European Council
Virtual Politic
EU
Law
K
Political science
J
German Carboni
European Virtual Politics
description Hooghe and Marks’ update of Rokkanian European cleavages recognises the existence of a European political arena with opposite poles. The paper first contrasts rhetorics on a European level by two European Council members at opposite poles, the French President E. Macron and the Hungarian President V. Orbán, then it compares their immigration policies on a national level. While a vast difference can be detected in the rhetorical dimension, their national regulations and executive decisions on immigration are stunningly similar. Such discrepancies are explained through an institutional analysis of the European Council, which gives structural incentives to perform “virtual politics” consisting of statements aimed at gathering domestic support against virtual “opponents”, while avoiding any political risky decisions at home. Furthermore, as theneoliberal nature of the EU incentivizes the status quo in this area, only pro-found institutional reform can lay the ground for a change.
format article
author German Carboni
author_facet German Carboni
author_sort German Carboni
title European Virtual Politics
title_short European Virtual Politics
title_full European Virtual Politics
title_fullStr European Virtual Politics
title_full_unstemmed European Virtual Politics
title_sort european virtual politics
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/6dea1494f54e462b9de39516b86924a0
work_keys_str_mv AT germancarboni europeanvirtualpolitics
_version_ 1718408627163758592