Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.

Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding fli...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Per Henningsson, Anders Hedenström, Richard J Bomphrey
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6deca58ae5ad4863affde56681afc35b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6deca58ae5ad4863affde56681afc35b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6deca58ae5ad4863affde56681afc35b2021-11-18T08:30:23ZEfficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0090170https://doaj.org/article/6deca58ae5ad4863affde56681afc35b2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24587260/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding flight, the wing experiences uniform incident flow and the optimal shape is a high aspect ratio wing with an elliptical planform. In flapping flight, on the other hand, the wing tip travels faster than the root, creating a spanwise velocity gradient. To compensate, the optimal wing shape should taper towards the tip (reducing the local chord) and/or twist from root to tip (reducing local angle of attack). We hypothesised that, if a bird is limited in its ability to morph its wings and adapt its wing shape to suit both flight modes, then a preference towards flapping flight optimization will be expected since this is the most energetically demanding flight mode. We tested this by studying a well-known flap-gliding species, the common swift, by measuring the wakes generated by two birds, one in gliding and one in flapping flight in a wind tunnel. We calculated span efficiency, the efficiency of lift production, and found that the flapping swift had consistently higher span efficiency than the gliding swift. This supports our hypothesis and suggests that even though swifts have been shown previously to increase their lift-to-drag ratio substantially when gliding, the wing morphology is tuned to be more aerodynamically efficient in generating lift during flapping. Since body drag can be assumed to be similar for both flapping and gliding, it follows that the higher total drag in flapping flight compared with gliding flight is primarily a consequence of an increase in wing profile drag due to the flapping motion, exceeding the reduction in induced drag.Per HenningssonAnders HedenströmRichard J BomphreyPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e90170 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Per Henningsson
Anders Hedenström
Richard J Bomphrey
Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
description Many flying animals use both flapping and gliding flight as part of their routine behaviour. These two kinematic patterns impose conflicting requirements on wing design for aerodynamic efficiency and, in the absence of extreme morphing, wings cannot be optimised for both flight modes. In gliding flight, the wing experiences uniform incident flow and the optimal shape is a high aspect ratio wing with an elliptical planform. In flapping flight, on the other hand, the wing tip travels faster than the root, creating a spanwise velocity gradient. To compensate, the optimal wing shape should taper towards the tip (reducing the local chord) and/or twist from root to tip (reducing local angle of attack). We hypothesised that, if a bird is limited in its ability to morph its wings and adapt its wing shape to suit both flight modes, then a preference towards flapping flight optimization will be expected since this is the most energetically demanding flight mode. We tested this by studying a well-known flap-gliding species, the common swift, by measuring the wakes generated by two birds, one in gliding and one in flapping flight in a wind tunnel. We calculated span efficiency, the efficiency of lift production, and found that the flapping swift had consistently higher span efficiency than the gliding swift. This supports our hypothesis and suggests that even though swifts have been shown previously to increase their lift-to-drag ratio substantially when gliding, the wing morphology is tuned to be more aerodynamically efficient in generating lift during flapping. Since body drag can be assumed to be similar for both flapping and gliding, it follows that the higher total drag in flapping flight compared with gliding flight is primarily a consequence of an increase in wing profile drag due to the flapping motion, exceeding the reduction in induced drag.
format article
author Per Henningsson
Anders Hedenström
Richard J Bomphrey
author_facet Per Henningsson
Anders Hedenström
Richard J Bomphrey
author_sort Per Henningsson
title Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
title_short Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
title_full Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
title_fullStr Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
title_sort efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/6deca58ae5ad4863affde56681afc35b
work_keys_str_mv AT perhenningsson efficiencyofliftproductioninflappingandglidingflightofswifts
AT andershedenstrom efficiencyofliftproductioninflappingandglidingflightofswifts
AT richardjbomphrey efficiencyofliftproductioninflappingandglidingflightofswifts
_version_ 1718421688459198464