Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
<h4>Background and aims</h4>Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a2021-11-18T07:22:41ZQuality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0033957https://doaj.org/article/6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22509267/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background and aims</h4>Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving physicians the ability to define areas for continuous quality improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>In ten endoscopy units in France, 200 patients per centre undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled in the study. An evaluation was carried out based on a prospectively developed checklist of 10 quality-control indicators including five dependent upon and five independent of the colonoscopy procedure.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 2000 procedures, 30% were done at general hospitals, 20% at university hospitals, and 50% in private practices. The colonoscopies were carried out for a valid indication for 95.9% (range 92.5-100). Colon preparation was insufficient in 3.7% (range 1-10.5). Colonoscopies were successful in 95.3% (range 81-99). Adenoma detection rate was 0.31 (range 0.17-0.45) in successful colonoscopies.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This tool for evaluating the quality of colonoscopy procedures in healthcare units is based on standard endoscopy and patient criteria. It is an easy and feasible procedure giving the ability to detect suboptimal practice and differences between endoscopy-units. It will enable individual units to assess the quality of their colonoscopy techniques.Romain CoriatAugustin LeclerDominique LamarqueJacques DeyraHervé RocheCatherine NizouOlivier BerrettaBruno MesnardMartin BouyguesAlain SoupisonJean-Luc MonninPhilippe PodevinCarole CassazDenis SautereauFrédéric PratStanislas ChaussadePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 4, p e33957 (2012) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Romain Coriat Augustin Lecler Dominique Lamarque Jacques Deyra Hervé Roche Catherine Nizou Olivier Berretta Bruno Mesnard Martin Bouygues Alain Soupison Jean-Luc Monnin Philippe Podevin Carole Cassaz Denis Sautereau Frédéric Prat Stanislas Chaussade Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
description |
<h4>Background and aims</h4>Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving physicians the ability to define areas for continuous quality improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>In ten endoscopy units in France, 200 patients per centre undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled in the study. An evaluation was carried out based on a prospectively developed checklist of 10 quality-control indicators including five dependent upon and five independent of the colonoscopy procedure.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 2000 procedures, 30% were done at general hospitals, 20% at university hospitals, and 50% in private practices. The colonoscopies were carried out for a valid indication for 95.9% (range 92.5-100). Colon preparation was insufficient in 3.7% (range 1-10.5). Colonoscopies were successful in 95.3% (range 81-99). Adenoma detection rate was 0.31 (range 0.17-0.45) in successful colonoscopies.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This tool for evaluating the quality of colonoscopy procedures in healthcare units is based on standard endoscopy and patient criteria. It is an easy and feasible procedure giving the ability to detect suboptimal practice and differences between endoscopy-units. It will enable individual units to assess the quality of their colonoscopy techniques. |
format |
article |
author |
Romain Coriat Augustin Lecler Dominique Lamarque Jacques Deyra Hervé Roche Catherine Nizou Olivier Berretta Bruno Mesnard Martin Bouygues Alain Soupison Jean-Luc Monnin Philippe Podevin Carole Cassaz Denis Sautereau Frédéric Prat Stanislas Chaussade |
author_facet |
Romain Coriat Augustin Lecler Dominique Lamarque Jacques Deyra Hervé Roche Catherine Nizou Olivier Berretta Bruno Mesnard Martin Bouygues Alain Soupison Jean-Luc Monnin Philippe Podevin Carole Cassaz Denis Sautereau Frédéric Prat Stanislas Chaussade |
author_sort |
Romain Coriat |
title |
Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
title_short |
Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
title_full |
Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
title_fullStr |
Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
title_sort |
quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT romaincoriat qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT augustinlecler qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT dominiquelamarque qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT jacquesdeyra qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT herveroche qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT catherinenizou qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT olivierberretta qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT brunomesnard qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT martinbouygues qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT alainsoupison qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT jeanlucmonnin qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT philippepodevin qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT carolecassaz qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT denissautereau qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT fredericprat qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits AT stanislaschaussade qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits |
_version_ |
1718423538575081472 |