Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process

This year’s theme for Peer Review Week is “Identity”, with a focus on promoting equity in peer review practices and recognizing how personal identity can influence the process. While many researchers may involve trainees with their reviews, not all will acknowledge the contributions made by these ea...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6e1ae92d39934f7bbb2314d33c8f4d3f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6e1ae92d39934f7bbb2314d33c8f4d3f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6e1ae92d39934f7bbb2314d33c8f4d3f2021-12-02T17:26:48ZTransparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process10.1038/s42003-021-02646-52399-3642https://doaj.org/article/6e1ae92d39934f7bbb2314d33c8f4d3f2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02646-5https://doaj.org/toc/2399-3642This year’s theme for Peer Review Week is “Identity”, with a focus on promoting equity in peer review practices and recognizing how personal identity can influence the process. While many researchers may involve trainees with their reviews, not all will acknowledge the contributions made by these early-career researchers or request that journals provide them with direct recognition. In this Q&A, we asked pairs of faculty and post-doctoral fellows who previously co-reviewed manuscripts at Communications Biology to reflect on their experiences with peer review, and the importance of including and recognizing early-career researchers as part of this process.Nature PortfolioarticleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENCommunications Biology, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
description This year’s theme for Peer Review Week is “Identity”, with a focus on promoting equity in peer review practices and recognizing how personal identity can influence the process. While many researchers may involve trainees with their reviews, not all will acknowledge the contributions made by these early-career researchers or request that journals provide them with direct recognition. In this Q&A, we asked pairs of faculty and post-doctoral fellows who previously co-reviewed manuscripts at Communications Biology to reflect on their experiences with peer review, and the importance of including and recognizing early-career researchers as part of this process.
format article
title Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_short Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_full Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_fullStr Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_full_unstemmed Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_sort transparency and training in peer review: discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6e1ae92d39934f7bbb2314d33c8f4d3f
_version_ 1718380794367442944