Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon

Accelerating deforestation and ecological degradation, linked to political and economic policies and agendas that endanger the health, well-being, and cultural survival of Indigenous people, present dire threats to the Amazonian biome and its inhabitants. Confronting these challenges necessitates a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael S Esbach, Flora Lu, Felipe Borman Quenama
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6e5c0cf1faa14ae496e8277f91835337
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6e5c0cf1faa14ae496e8277f91835337
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6e5c0cf1faa14ae496e8277f918353372021-11-19T10:59:17ZConservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon0972-492310.4103/cs.cs_20_137https://doaj.org/article/6e5c0cf1faa14ae496e8277f918353372021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2021;volume=19;issue=4;spage=259;epage=270;aulast=Esbachhttps://doaj.org/toc/0972-4923Accelerating deforestation and ecological degradation, linked to political and economic policies and agendas that endanger the health, well-being, and cultural survival of Indigenous people, present dire threats to the Amazonian biome and its inhabitants. Confronting these challenges necessitates a unified response by local and global partners. However, some conservationists, predominantly from the Global North, have perpetuated problematic, essentialised framings of Indigenous communities, which have even led them to advocate for punitive protectionist policies that we argue are morally and conceptually flawed. Western scientific and popular discourse often presents nature conservation via protected areas as a universal good. In this article, we argue for a more pluralistic approach; one that calls for an equitable footing between Indigenous knowledge and sustainability science. We examine a case study of the Cofán community of Zábalo in the Ecuadorian Amazon, where collective efforts to tsampima coiraye (=care for the forest) have resulted in dynamic institutions adapted to diverse challenges and opportunities. Tsampima coiraye exemplifies a form of caretaking that is distinct from and complementary to Western conservation, one that provides important insights into understanding the context and meanings through which community governance fosters stewardship. We draw upon longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork and the Cofán concept of puifama atesuye (=Two-World Knowledge) to describe collective action, community governance, and caretaking.Michael S EsbachFlora LuFelipe Borman QuenamaWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleamazoncareconservationcofánecuadorindigenous peopleEcologyQH540-549.5ENConservation & Society, Vol 19, Iss 4, Pp 259-270 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic amazon
care
conservation
cofán
ecuador
indigenous people
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle amazon
care
conservation
cofán
ecuador
indigenous people
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Michael S Esbach
Flora Lu
Felipe Borman Quenama
Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
description Accelerating deforestation and ecological degradation, linked to political and economic policies and agendas that endanger the health, well-being, and cultural survival of Indigenous people, present dire threats to the Amazonian biome and its inhabitants. Confronting these challenges necessitates a unified response by local and global partners. However, some conservationists, predominantly from the Global North, have perpetuated problematic, essentialised framings of Indigenous communities, which have even led them to advocate for punitive protectionist policies that we argue are morally and conceptually flawed. Western scientific and popular discourse often presents nature conservation via protected areas as a universal good. In this article, we argue for a more pluralistic approach; one that calls for an equitable footing between Indigenous knowledge and sustainability science. We examine a case study of the Cofán community of Zábalo in the Ecuadorian Amazon, where collective efforts to tsampima coiraye (=care for the forest) have resulted in dynamic institutions adapted to diverse challenges and opportunities. Tsampima coiraye exemplifies a form of caretaking that is distinct from and complementary to Western conservation, one that provides important insights into understanding the context and meanings through which community governance fosters stewardship. We draw upon longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork and the Cofán concept of puifama atesuye (=Two-World Knowledge) to describe collective action, community governance, and caretaking.
format article
author Michael S Esbach
Flora Lu
Felipe Borman Quenama
author_facet Michael S Esbach
Flora Lu
Felipe Borman Quenama
author_sort Michael S Esbach
title Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
title_short Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
title_full Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
title_fullStr Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
title_sort conservation and care among the cofán in the ecuadorian amazon
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6e5c0cf1faa14ae496e8277f91835337
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelsesbach conservationandcareamongthecofanintheecuadorianamazon
AT floralu conservationandcareamongthecofanintheecuadorianamazon
AT felipebormanquenama conservationandcareamongthecofanintheecuadorianamazon
_version_ 1718420136858222592