The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia

This article argues that bureaucracy plays politics in Indonesia, not only during the electoral periods, but also in public service. Using the case of environmental evaluation in local government, where natural resources comprise most of the local economy, this article discusses the politics of bur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laila Alfirdaus, S. Rouli Manalu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6e69f8221f6649baa29d9b5bec62be4d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6e69f8221f6649baa29d9b5bec62be4d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6e69f8221f6649baa29d9b5bec62be4d2021-12-02T14:05:02ZThe politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia10.24135/pjr.v26i2.11341023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/6e69f8221f6649baa29d9b5bec62be4d2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1134https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 This article argues that bureaucracy plays politics in Indonesia, not only during the electoral periods, but also in public service. Using the case of environmental evaluation in local government, where natural resources comprise most of the local economy, this article discusses the politics of bureaucracy in undergoing daily governing processes. The environment and natural resource businesses are two opposing fields. Environmental evaluation becomes a contentious area and is usually highly political. This article identifies the bureaucracy’s politicisation in environmental evaluation as occuring in at least in two forms—in measurement and in project implementation. In terms of measurement, bureaucracy tends to use minimum standards, while in project implementation, there are some occasions where bureaucracy tends to sub-contract the work to the third party, usually NGOs, especially in relations to sensitive issues, so that it is politically safer for them, once the result is not as pleasing as expected. This article uses some cases in Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, Central Java, and Bangka Belitung, and applied case study as research approach. Laila AlfirdausS. Rouli ManaluAsia Pacific Networkarticlebureaucracycase studiesenvironmentenvironmental communicationenvironmental evaluationsIndonesiaCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 26, Iss 2 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bureaucracy
case studies
environment
environmental communication
environmental evaluations
Indonesia
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle bureaucracy
case studies
environment
environmental communication
environmental evaluations
Indonesia
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Laila Alfirdaus
S. Rouli Manalu
The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia
description This article argues that bureaucracy plays politics in Indonesia, not only during the electoral periods, but also in public service. Using the case of environmental evaluation in local government, where natural resources comprise most of the local economy, this article discusses the politics of bureaucracy in undergoing daily governing processes. The environment and natural resource businesses are two opposing fields. Environmental evaluation becomes a contentious area and is usually highly political. This article identifies the bureaucracy’s politicisation in environmental evaluation as occuring in at least in two forms—in measurement and in project implementation. In terms of measurement, bureaucracy tends to use minimum standards, while in project implementation, there are some occasions where bureaucracy tends to sub-contract the work to the third party, usually NGOs, especially in relations to sensitive issues, so that it is politically safer for them, once the result is not as pleasing as expected. This article uses some cases in Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, Central Java, and Bangka Belitung, and applied case study as research approach.
format article
author Laila Alfirdaus
S. Rouli Manalu
author_facet Laila Alfirdaus
S. Rouli Manalu
author_sort Laila Alfirdaus
title The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia
title_short The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia
title_full The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia
title_fullStr The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia
title_sort politics of local government environmental evaluations: assessing bureaucracy in post-reformasi indonesia
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/6e69f8221f6649baa29d9b5bec62be4d
work_keys_str_mv AT lailaalfirdaus thepoliticsoflocalgovernmentenvironmentalevaluationsassessingbureaucracyinpostreformasiindonesia
AT sroulimanalu thepoliticsoflocalgovernmentenvironmentalevaluationsassessingbureaucracyinpostreformasiindonesia
AT lailaalfirdaus politicsoflocalgovernmentenvironmentalevaluationsassessingbureaucracyinpostreformasiindonesia
AT sroulimanalu politicsoflocalgovernmentenvironmentalevaluationsassessingbureaucracyinpostreformasiindonesia
_version_ 1718392026190315520