Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.

The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biolog...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James Karabin, Izaac Mansfield, Emma K Frow
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f92
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f92
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f922021-12-02T20:06:13ZExploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257327https://doaj.org/article/6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f922021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257327https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability.James KarabinIzaac MansfieldEmma K FrowPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257327 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
James Karabin
Izaac Mansfield
Emma K Frow
Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
description The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability.
format article
author James Karabin
Izaac Mansfield
Emma K Frow
author_facet James Karabin
Izaac Mansfield
Emma K Frow
author_sort James Karabin
title Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
title_short Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
title_full Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
title_fullStr Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
title_full_unstemmed Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
title_sort exploring presentations of sustainability by us synthetic biology companies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f92
work_keys_str_mv AT jameskarabin exploringpresentationsofsustainabilitybyussyntheticbiologycompanies
AT izaacmansfield exploringpresentationsofsustainabilitybyussyntheticbiologycompanies
AT emmakfrow exploringpresentationsofsustainabilitybyussyntheticbiologycompanies
_version_ 1718375430977748992