On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system

Abstract Individual estimates of cochlear compression may provide complementary information to traditional audiometric hearing thresholds in disentangling different types of peripheral cochlear damage. Here we investigated the use of the slope of envelope following response (EFR) magnitude-level fun...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerard Encina-Llamas, Torsten Dau, Bastian Epp
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6e8ded9922164416a6f0bc18f34457fc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6e8ded9922164416a6f0bc18f34457fc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6e8ded9922164416a6f0bc18f34457fc2021-12-02T13:24:13ZOn the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system10.1038/s41598-021-85850-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6e8ded9922164416a6f0bc18f34457fc2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85850-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Individual estimates of cochlear compression may provide complementary information to traditional audiometric hearing thresholds in disentangling different types of peripheral cochlear damage. Here we investigated the use of the slope of envelope following response (EFR) magnitude-level functions obtained from four simultaneously presented amplitude modulated tones with modulation frequencies of 80–100 Hz as a proxy of peripheral level compression. Compression estimates in individual normal hearing (NH) listeners were consistent with previously reported group-averaged compression estimates based on psychoacoustical and distortion-product oto-acoustic emission (DPOAE) measures in human listeners. They were also similar to basilar membrane (BM) compression values measured invasively in non-human mammals. EFR-based compression estimates in hearing-impaired listeners were less compressive than those for the NH listeners, consistent with a reduction of BM compression. Cochlear compression was also estimated using DPOAEs in the same NH listeners. DPOAE estimates were larger (less compressive) than EFRs estimates, showing no correlation. Despite the numerical concordance between EFR-based compression estimates and group-averaged estimates from other methods, simulations using an auditory nerve (AN) model revealed that compression estimates based on EFRs might be highly influenced by contributions from off-characteristic frequency (CF) neural populations. This compromises the possibility to estimate on-CF (i.e., frequency-specific or “local”) peripheral level compression with EFRs.Gerard Encina-LlamasTorsten DauBastian EppNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Gerard Encina-Llamas
Torsten Dau
Bastian Epp
On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
description Abstract Individual estimates of cochlear compression may provide complementary information to traditional audiometric hearing thresholds in disentangling different types of peripheral cochlear damage. Here we investigated the use of the slope of envelope following response (EFR) magnitude-level functions obtained from four simultaneously presented amplitude modulated tones with modulation frequencies of 80–100 Hz as a proxy of peripheral level compression. Compression estimates in individual normal hearing (NH) listeners were consistent with previously reported group-averaged compression estimates based on psychoacoustical and distortion-product oto-acoustic emission (DPOAE) measures in human listeners. They were also similar to basilar membrane (BM) compression values measured invasively in non-human mammals. EFR-based compression estimates in hearing-impaired listeners were less compressive than those for the NH listeners, consistent with a reduction of BM compression. Cochlear compression was also estimated using DPOAEs in the same NH listeners. DPOAE estimates were larger (less compressive) than EFRs estimates, showing no correlation. Despite the numerical concordance between EFR-based compression estimates and group-averaged estimates from other methods, simulations using an auditory nerve (AN) model revealed that compression estimates based on EFRs might be highly influenced by contributions from off-characteristic frequency (CF) neural populations. This compromises the possibility to estimate on-CF (i.e., frequency-specific or “local”) peripheral level compression with EFRs.
format article
author Gerard Encina-Llamas
Torsten Dau
Bastian Epp
author_facet Gerard Encina-Llamas
Torsten Dau
Bastian Epp
author_sort Gerard Encina-Llamas
title On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
title_short On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
title_full On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
title_fullStr On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
title_full_unstemmed On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
title_sort on the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6e8ded9922164416a6f0bc18f34457fc
work_keys_str_mv AT gerardencinallamas ontheuseofenvelopefollowingresponsestoestimateperipherallevelcompressionintheauditorysystem
AT torstendau ontheuseofenvelopefollowingresponsestoestimateperipherallevelcompressionintheauditorysystem
AT bastianepp ontheuseofenvelopefollowingresponsestoestimateperipherallevelcompressionintheauditorysystem
_version_ 1718393099068112896