Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism

Drawing upon the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari this essay puts forth the argument that in finance capitalism debt resolution performs as an elusive promise and an appearance that re-constitutes unpayable debt. A close elaboration on Nietzsche’s conceptual...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Christina BANALOPOULOU
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR
Publicado:	Editura ASE Bucuresti 2020
Materias:	debt performativity debt politics apollo dionysus realism Economics as a science HB71-74
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6e977f72d82347d98cc44a88eee49d20
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6e977f72d82347d98cc44a88eee49d20
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6e977f72d82347d98cc44a88eee49d202021-12-02T15:16:26ZNietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism1843-22981844-8208https://doaj.org/article/6e977f72d82347d98cc44a88eee49d202020-11-01T00:00:00Z https://jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8938 https://doaj.org/toc/1843-2298https://doaj.org/toc/1844-8208Drawing upon the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari this essay puts forth the argument that in finance capitalism debt resolution performs as an elusive promise and an appearance that re-constitutes unpayable debt. A close elaboration on Nietzsche’s conceptual cartographies of the relation between the flows of Apollo and Dionysus and on the contextualization of this relation within capitalist frames that, as this essay demonstrates, Deleuze and Guattari explore in both Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus contributes to the argument that in finance capitalism unpayable debt is performatively constituted through illusions of debt resolution. To date little work offers a performative approach of Deleuze and Guattari’s conceptualization of the differential relation between the two flows of capital that constitute unpayable debt, including the ties between these flows and Nietzsche’s grasp of the differential relation between Apollo and Dionysus. As a result the performative strategies that constitute, justify, and reproduce unpayable debt in finance capitalism remain relatively unexplored. This essay draws upon the works of Nietzsche and Deleuze and Guattari and adds a performative methodology on the ongoing discussions on debt in order to address the practices that infinitize debt under the gaze of financial capital.Christina BANALOPOULOUEditura ASE Bucurestiarticledebt performativitydebt politicsapollodionysusrealismEconomics as a scienceHB71-74DEENFRJournal of Philosophical Economics, Vol XIII, Iss 2, Pp 91-115 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR
topic	debt performativity debt politics apollo dionysus realism Economics as a science HB71-74
spellingShingle	debt performativity debt politics apollo dionysus realism Economics as a science HB71-74 Christina BANALOPOULOU Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
description	Drawing upon the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari this essay puts forth the argument that in finance capitalism debt resolution performs as an elusive promise and an appearance that re-constitutes unpayable debt. A close elaboration on Nietzsche’s conceptual cartographies of the relation between the flows of Apollo and Dionysus and on the contextualization of this relation within capitalist frames that, as this essay demonstrates, Deleuze and Guattari explore in both Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus contributes to the argument that in finance capitalism unpayable debt is performatively constituted through illusions of debt resolution. To date little work offers a performative approach of Deleuze and Guattari’s conceptualization of the differential relation between the two flows of capital that constitute unpayable debt, including the ties between these flows and Nietzsche’s grasp of the differential relation between Apollo and Dionysus. As a result the performative strategies that constitute, justify, and reproduce unpayable debt in finance capitalism remain relatively unexplored. This essay draws upon the works of Nietzsche and Deleuze and Guattari and adds a performative methodology on the ongoing discussions on debt in order to address the practices that infinitize debt under the gaze of financial capital.
format	article
author	Christina BANALOPOULOU
author_facet	Christina BANALOPOULOU
author_sort	Christina BANALOPOULOU
title	Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
title_short	Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
title_full	Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
title_fullStr	Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
title_full_unstemmed	Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
title_sort	nietzsche, deleuze and guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism
publisher	Editura ASE Bucuresti
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/6e977f72d82347d98cc44a88eee49d20
work_keys_str_mv	AT christinabanalopoulou nietzschedeleuzeandguattariperformativeconstitutionofunpayabledebtinfinancecapitalism
_version_	1718387451326627840

Nietzsche, Deleuze and Guattari: performative constitution of unpayable debt in finance capitalism

Ejemplares similares