El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863

The hardness in the armed struggle that defined the Federal war in Venezuela, country men war against large landed estate, from liberals against “godos” and poor against rich ones, is doubtless the hardest moment in social violence that occured almost all XIX century long and transformed that event...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Reinaldo Rojas
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
PT
Publicado: Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6e9cc7bed2b948b99d2e930f01876e0f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6e9cc7bed2b948b99d2e930f01876e0f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6e9cc7bed2b948b99d2e930f01876e0f2021-12-02T10:28:42ZEl miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-18631626-025210.4000/nuevomundo.7191https://doaj.org/article/6e9cc7bed2b948b99d2e930f01876e0f2007-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/7191https://doaj.org/toc/1626-0252The hardness in the armed struggle that defined the Federal war in Venezuela, country men war against large landed estate, from liberals against “godos” and poor against rich ones, is doubtless the hardest moment in social violence that occured almost all XIX century long and transformed that event in a real “fabrique d’emotions”, whose effects in venezuelan mind has been treated by positivist historians like Lisandro Alvarado and Laureano Vallenilla Lanz in accordance with social equality thesis. Besides this historiographic work about the political effects of that warlike event, the study of the debate made in 1867 and 1868 between these two great thinkers from that time, “Don” Cecilio Acosta and Dr. Ildefonso Riera Aguinagalde, about the justice and necessity of that social war, can give us the keys about the sensibility level of that society which assumed the notion of revolution, appearing in the venezuelan political vocabulary as a representation of the necessity of social change related to the progress, justice and freedom idea, which was only possible through violence way. The purpose of this communication is to contextualize that debate, either in its social element or in the symbolic universe in which the sensibility to change and its mediation through the liberal political discourse is introduced.Reinaldo RojasCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américainsarticleideas políticasAcosta (Cecilio)Riera-AguinaldeGuerra federalliberalismAnthropologyGN1-890Latin America. Spanish AmericaF1201-3799ENFRPTNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
PT
topic ideas políticas
Acosta (Cecilio)
Riera-Aguinalde
Guerra federal
liberalism
Anthropology
GN1-890
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
spellingShingle ideas políticas
Acosta (Cecilio)
Riera-Aguinalde
Guerra federal
liberalism
Anthropology
GN1-890
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
Reinaldo Rojas
El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863
description The hardness in the armed struggle that defined the Federal war in Venezuela, country men war against large landed estate, from liberals against “godos” and poor against rich ones, is doubtless the hardest moment in social violence that occured almost all XIX century long and transformed that event in a real “fabrique d’emotions”, whose effects in venezuelan mind has been treated by positivist historians like Lisandro Alvarado and Laureano Vallenilla Lanz in accordance with social equality thesis. Besides this historiographic work about the political effects of that warlike event, the study of the debate made in 1867 and 1868 between these two great thinkers from that time, “Don” Cecilio Acosta and Dr. Ildefonso Riera Aguinagalde, about the justice and necessity of that social war, can give us the keys about the sensibility level of that society which assumed the notion of revolution, appearing in the venezuelan political vocabulary as a representation of the necessity of social change related to the progress, justice and freedom idea, which was only possible through violence way. The purpose of this communication is to contextualize that debate, either in its social element or in the symbolic universe in which the sensibility to change and its mediation through the liberal political discourse is introduced.
format article
author Reinaldo Rojas
author_facet Reinaldo Rojas
author_sort Reinaldo Rojas
title El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863
title_short El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863
title_full El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863
title_fullStr El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863
title_full_unstemmed El miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate Acosta-Riera Aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en Venezuela, 1859-1863
title_sort el miedo a la revolución y los “deberes del patriotismo”: el debate acosta-riera aguinagalde frente a la guerra federal en venezuela, 1859-1863
publisher Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/6e9cc7bed2b948b99d2e930f01876e0f
work_keys_str_mv AT reinaldorojas elmiedoalarevolucionylosdeberesdelpatriotismoeldebateacostarieraaguinagaldefrentealaguerrafederalenvenezuela18591863
_version_ 1718397173333229568