Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase

The linear dose–response relationship has long been assumed in assessments of health risk from an incremental chemical emission relative to background emissions. In this study, we systematically examine the relevancy of such an assumption with real-world data. We used the reported emission data, as...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dingsheng Li, Li Li
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6eba891bf1114e0d9cd2686174452a8b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6eba891bf1114e0d9cd2686174452a8b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6eba891bf1114e0d9cd2686174452a8b2021-11-25T19:08:18ZHuman Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase10.3390/toxics91103082305-6304https://doaj.org/article/6eba891bf1114e0d9cd2686174452a8b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/9/11/308https://doaj.org/toc/2305-6304The linear dose–response relationship has long been assumed in assessments of health risk from an incremental chemical emission relative to background emissions. In this study, we systematically examine the relevancy of such an assumption with real-world data. We used the reported emission data, as background emissions, from the 2017 U.S. National Emission Inventory for 95 organic chemicals to estimate the central tendencies of exposures of the general U.S. population. Previously published nonlinear dose–response relationships for chemicals were used to estimate health risk from exposure. We also explored and identified four intervals of exposure in which the nonlinear dose–response relationship may be linearly approximated with fixed slopes. Predicted rates of exposure to these 95 chemicals are all within the lowest of the four intervals and associated with low health risk. The health risk may be overestimated if a slope on the dose–response relationship extrapolated from toxicological assays based on high response rates is used for a marginal increase in emission not substantially higher than background emissions. To improve the confidence of human health risk estimates for chemicals, future efforts should focus on deriving a more accurate dose–response relationship at lower response rates and interface it with exposure assessments.Dingsheng LiLi LiMDPI AGarticlebackground emissionexposure modelingdose–response relationshiphuman health risk assessmentChemical technologyTP1-1185ENToxics, Vol 9, Iss 308, p 308 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic background emission
exposure modeling
dose–response relationship
human health risk assessment
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle background emission
exposure modeling
dose–response relationship
human health risk assessment
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Dingsheng Li
Li Li
Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase
description The linear dose–response relationship has long been assumed in assessments of health risk from an incremental chemical emission relative to background emissions. In this study, we systematically examine the relevancy of such an assumption with real-world data. We used the reported emission data, as background emissions, from the 2017 U.S. National Emission Inventory for 95 organic chemicals to estimate the central tendencies of exposures of the general U.S. population. Previously published nonlinear dose–response relationships for chemicals were used to estimate health risk from exposure. We also explored and identified four intervals of exposure in which the nonlinear dose–response relationship may be linearly approximated with fixed slopes. Predicted rates of exposure to these 95 chemicals are all within the lowest of the four intervals and associated with low health risk. The health risk may be overestimated if a slope on the dose–response relationship extrapolated from toxicological assays based on high response rates is used for a marginal increase in emission not substantially higher than background emissions. To improve the confidence of human health risk estimates for chemicals, future efforts should focus on deriving a more accurate dose–response relationship at lower response rates and interface it with exposure assessments.
format article
author Dingsheng Li
Li Li
author_facet Dingsheng Li
Li Li
author_sort Dingsheng Li
title Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase
title_short Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase
title_full Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase
title_fullStr Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase
title_full_unstemmed Human Chemical Exposure from Background Emissions in the United States and the Implication for Quantifying Risks from Marginal Emission Increase
title_sort human chemical exposure from background emissions in the united states and the implication for quantifying risks from marginal emission increase
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6eba891bf1114e0d9cd2686174452a8b
work_keys_str_mv AT dingshengli humanchemicalexposurefrombackgroundemissionsintheunitedstatesandtheimplicationforquantifyingrisksfrommarginalemissionincrease
AT lili humanchemicalexposurefrombackgroundemissionsintheunitedstatesandtheimplicationforquantifyingrisksfrommarginalemissionincrease
_version_ 1718410222927609856