The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology

This article demonstrates that the Rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning (DIF) in single tests. The person total score is the sufficient statistic for the person parameter estimate, eliminating the possibility for residuals at the test level. An alternative approach is t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephen Humphry, Paul Montuoro
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf2021-11-30T12:59:22ZThe Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology2504-284X10.3389/feduc.2021.742560https://doaj.org/article/6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.742560/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2504-284XThis article demonstrates that the Rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning (DIF) in single tests. The person total score is the sufficient statistic for the person parameter estimate, eliminating the possibility for residuals at the test level. An alternative approach is to use subset DIF analysis to search for DIF in item subsets that form the components of the broader latent trait. In this methodology, person parameter estimates are initially calculated using all test items. Then, in separate analyses, these person estimates are compared to the observed means in each subset, and the residuals assessed. As such, this methodology tests the assumption that the person locations in each factor group are invariant across subsets. The first objective is to demonstrate that in single tests differences in factor groups will appear as differences in the mean person estimates and the distributions of these estimates. The second objective is to demonstrate how subset DIF analysis reveals differences between person estimates and the observed means in subsets. Implications for practitioners are discussed.Stephen HumphryPaul MontuoroFrontiers Media S.A.articlepsychometricsRasch modelinvariancedifferential item functioning (DIF)systematic DIFsubset DIFEducation (General)L7-991ENFrontiers in Education, Vol 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic psychometrics
Rasch model
invariance
differential item functioning (DIF)
systematic DIF
subset DIF
Education (General)
L7-991
spellingShingle psychometrics
Rasch model
invariance
differential item functioning (DIF)
systematic DIF
subset DIF
Education (General)
L7-991
Stephen Humphry
Paul Montuoro
The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
description This article demonstrates that the Rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning (DIF) in single tests. The person total score is the sufficient statistic for the person parameter estimate, eliminating the possibility for residuals at the test level. An alternative approach is to use subset DIF analysis to search for DIF in item subsets that form the components of the broader latent trait. In this methodology, person parameter estimates are initially calculated using all test items. Then, in separate analyses, these person estimates are compared to the observed means in each subset, and the residuals assessed. As such, this methodology tests the assumption that the person locations in each factor group are invariant across subsets. The first objective is to demonstrate that in single tests differences in factor groups will appear as differences in the mean person estimates and the distributions of these estimates. The second objective is to demonstrate how subset DIF analysis reveals differences between person estimates and the observed means in subsets. Implications for practitioners are discussed.
format article
author Stephen Humphry
Paul Montuoro
author_facet Stephen Humphry
Paul Montuoro
author_sort Stephen Humphry
title The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
title_short The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
title_full The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
title_fullStr The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
title_full_unstemmed The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
title_sort rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning in single tests: subset dif analysis as an alternative methodology
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenhumphry theraschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology
AT paulmontuoro theraschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology
AT stephenhumphry raschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology
AT paulmontuoro raschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology
_version_ 1718406568667512832