The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology
This article demonstrates that the Rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning (DIF) in single tests. The person total score is the sufficient statistic for the person parameter estimate, eliminating the possibility for residuals at the test level. An alternative approach is t...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf2021-11-30T12:59:22ZThe Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology2504-284X10.3389/feduc.2021.742560https://doaj.org/article/6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.742560/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2504-284XThis article demonstrates that the Rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning (DIF) in single tests. The person total score is the sufficient statistic for the person parameter estimate, eliminating the possibility for residuals at the test level. An alternative approach is to use subset DIF analysis to search for DIF in item subsets that form the components of the broader latent trait. In this methodology, person parameter estimates are initially calculated using all test items. Then, in separate analyses, these person estimates are compared to the observed means in each subset, and the residuals assessed. As such, this methodology tests the assumption that the person locations in each factor group are invariant across subsets. The first objective is to demonstrate that in single tests differences in factor groups will appear as differences in the mean person estimates and the distributions of these estimates. The second objective is to demonstrate how subset DIF analysis reveals differences between person estimates and the observed means in subsets. Implications for practitioners are discussed.Stephen HumphryPaul MontuoroFrontiers Media S.A.articlepsychometricsRasch modelinvariancedifferential item functioning (DIF)systematic DIFsubset DIFEducation (General)L7-991ENFrontiers in Education, Vol 6 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
psychometrics Rasch model invariance differential item functioning (DIF) systematic DIF subset DIF Education (General) L7-991 |
spellingShingle |
psychometrics Rasch model invariance differential item functioning (DIF) systematic DIF subset DIF Education (General) L7-991 Stephen Humphry Paul Montuoro The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology |
description |
This article demonstrates that the Rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning (DIF) in single tests. The person total score is the sufficient statistic for the person parameter estimate, eliminating the possibility for residuals at the test level. An alternative approach is to use subset DIF analysis to search for DIF in item subsets that form the components of the broader latent trait. In this methodology, person parameter estimates are initially calculated using all test items. Then, in separate analyses, these person estimates are compared to the observed means in each subset, and the residuals assessed. As such, this methodology tests the assumption that the person locations in each factor group are invariant across subsets. The first objective is to demonstrate that in single tests differences in factor groups will appear as differences in the mean person estimates and the distributions of these estimates. The second objective is to demonstrate how subset DIF analysis reveals differences between person estimates and the observed means in subsets. Implications for practitioners are discussed. |
format |
article |
author |
Stephen Humphry Paul Montuoro |
author_facet |
Stephen Humphry Paul Montuoro |
author_sort |
Stephen Humphry |
title |
The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology |
title_short |
The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology |
title_full |
The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology |
title_fullStr |
The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Rasch Model Cannot Reveal Systematic Differential Item Functioning in Single Tests: Subset DIF Analysis as an Alternative Methodology |
title_sort |
rasch model cannot reveal systematic differential item functioning in single tests: subset dif analysis as an alternative methodology |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6ee95702a9a24ef69921a5cbecefcbcf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephenhumphry theraschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology AT paulmontuoro theraschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology AT stephenhumphry raschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology AT paulmontuoro raschmodelcannotrevealsystematicdifferentialitemfunctioninginsingletestssubsetdifanalysisasanalternativemethodology |
_version_ |
1718406568667512832 |