Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed

The problem that often comes by farmers is a shortage of feed in the dry season; one of the technologies that can be used is silage. Carrot straw (CRS) can be used as a silage material because of its abundance and nutritional value, which is good for the livestock. The purpose of this study is to kn...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: B. Muwakhid, U. Kalsum, A. M. Wati
Formato: article
Lenguaje:ID
Publicado: Universitas Andalas 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6eee1b427a064e07a4ccd3d4cdd04082
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6eee1b427a064e07a4ccd3d4cdd04082
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6eee1b427a064e07a4ccd3d4cdd040822021-11-11T23:03:28ZEffect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed1907-17602460-662610.25077/jpi.23.3.240-246.2021https://doaj.org/article/6eee1b427a064e07a4ccd3d4cdd040822021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jpi.faterna.unand.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/697https://doaj.org/toc/1907-1760https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6626The problem that often comes by farmers is a shortage of feed in the dry season; one of the technologies that can be used is silage. Carrot straw (CRS) can be used as a silage material because of its abundance and nutritional value, which is good for the livestock. The purpose of this study is to know about the differences in the provision of feed additives, i.e., Lactobacillus casei-A, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Lactobacillus casei-B of the composition of CRS  silage. Making silage by means of CRS was weighed, CRS was placed on a tray and added with feed additives based on experimental treatment, CRS was mixed thoroughly, stored, and closed in a laboratory-scale silo then placed at 26-28oC. CRS was given with three different feed additive treatments: CRS + 0.01% Lactobacillus casei-A, CRS + 0.01% Lactobacillus plantarum, CRS + 0.01% Lactobacillus casei-B. Ensiling was carried out for 21 days in four replications for each treatment, and each replication was made in duplicate. Statistical analysis after the data was obtained was using the SAS University application specification 4.0 red hat (64-bit) with code, and the difference between the treatment means (P<0.01) was determined using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). This study resulted that the different types of use of lactic acid bacteria had a significant effect (P<0.01) on organic matter content (OM), crude fiber content (CF), extract ether content (EE), nitrogen-free extract (NFE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF). This study concludes that the difference in the provision of feed additives affects the chemical composition of carrot straw silage. To sum up, Lactobacillus casei-A has a good value on NFE while Lactobacillus casei-B has a good value on OM, CF, EE, NDF, and ADF.B. MuwakhidU. KalsumA. M. WatiUniversitas Andalasarticlecarrot strawchemical compositionsilageAnimal cultureSF1-1100IDJurnal Peternakan Indonesia, Vol 23, Iss 3, Pp 240-246 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language ID
topic carrot straw
chemical composition
silage
Animal culture
SF1-1100
spellingShingle carrot straw
chemical composition
silage
Animal culture
SF1-1100
B. Muwakhid
U. Kalsum
A. M. Wati
Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed
description The problem that often comes by farmers is a shortage of feed in the dry season; one of the technologies that can be used is silage. Carrot straw (CRS) can be used as a silage material because of its abundance and nutritional value, which is good for the livestock. The purpose of this study is to know about the differences in the provision of feed additives, i.e., Lactobacillus casei-A, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Lactobacillus casei-B of the composition of CRS  silage. Making silage by means of CRS was weighed, CRS was placed on a tray and added with feed additives based on experimental treatment, CRS was mixed thoroughly, stored, and closed in a laboratory-scale silo then placed at 26-28oC. CRS was given with three different feed additive treatments: CRS + 0.01% Lactobacillus casei-A, CRS + 0.01% Lactobacillus plantarum, CRS + 0.01% Lactobacillus casei-B. Ensiling was carried out for 21 days in four replications for each treatment, and each replication was made in duplicate. Statistical analysis after the data was obtained was using the SAS University application specification 4.0 red hat (64-bit) with code, and the difference between the treatment means (P<0.01) was determined using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). This study resulted that the different types of use of lactic acid bacteria had a significant effect (P<0.01) on organic matter content (OM), crude fiber content (CF), extract ether content (EE), nitrogen-free extract (NFE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF). This study concludes that the difference in the provision of feed additives affects the chemical composition of carrot straw silage. To sum up, Lactobacillus casei-A has a good value on NFE while Lactobacillus casei-B has a good value on OM, CF, EE, NDF, and ADF.
format article
author B. Muwakhid
U. Kalsum
A. M. Wati
author_facet B. Muwakhid
U. Kalsum
A. M. Wati
author_sort B. Muwakhid
title Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed
title_short Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed
title_full Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed
title_fullStr Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Feed Additives on Ensiled Carrot Straw as an Animal Feed
title_sort effect of different feed additives on ensiled carrot straw as an animal feed
publisher Universitas Andalas
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6eee1b427a064e07a4ccd3d4cdd04082
work_keys_str_mv AT bmuwakhid effectofdifferentfeedadditivesonensiledcarrotstrawasananimalfeed
AT ukalsum effectofdifferentfeedadditivesonensiledcarrotstrawasananimalfeed
AT amwati effectofdifferentfeedadditivesonensiledcarrotstrawasananimalfeed
_version_ 1718431356017442816