Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.

The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then ess...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebastian Weitz, Stéphane Blanco, Richard Fournier, Jacques Gautrais, Christian Jost, Guy Theraulaz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6f18f18c0e344b71a54157e2d7919e28
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6f18f18c0e344b71a54157e2d7919e28
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6f18f18c0e344b71a54157e2d7919e282021-11-18T07:14:22ZModeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0038588https://doaj.org/article/6f18f18c0e344b71a54157e2d7919e282012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22761685/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then essentially to demonstrate that the observed collective features may be the result of self-organizing processes involving quite simple individual behaviors. Other studies concentrate on the objective of establishing or enriching links between collective behavior researches and cognitive or physiological ones, which then requires that each individual rule be carefully validated. Here we discuss the methodological consequences of this additional requirement. Using the example of corpse clustering in ants, we first illustrate that it may be impossible to discriminate among alternative individual rules by considering only observational data collected at the group level. Six individual behavioral models are described: They are clearly distinct in terms of individual behaviors, they all reproduce satisfactorily the collective dynamics and distribution patterns observed in experiments, and we show theoretically that it is strictly impossible to discriminate two of these models even in the limit of an infinite amount of data whatever the accuracy level. A set of methodological steps are then listed and discussed as practical ways to partially overcome this problem. They involve complementary experimental protocols specifically designed to address the behavioral rules successively, conserving group-level data for the overall model validation. In this context, we highlight the importance of maintaining a sharp distinction between model enunciation, with explicit references to validated biological concepts, and formal translation of these concepts in terms of quantitative state variables and fittable functional dependences. Illustrative examples are provided of the benefits expected during the often long and difficult process of refining a behavioral model, designing adapted experimental protocols and inversing model parameters.Sebastian WeitzStéphane BlancoRichard FournierJacques GautraisChristian JostGuy TheraulazPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 6, p e38588 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sebastian Weitz
Stéphane Blanco
Richard Fournier
Jacques Gautrais
Christian Jost
Guy Theraulaz
Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
description The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then essentially to demonstrate that the observed collective features may be the result of self-organizing processes involving quite simple individual behaviors. Other studies concentrate on the objective of establishing or enriching links between collective behavior researches and cognitive or physiological ones, which then requires that each individual rule be carefully validated. Here we discuss the methodological consequences of this additional requirement. Using the example of corpse clustering in ants, we first illustrate that it may be impossible to discriminate among alternative individual rules by considering only observational data collected at the group level. Six individual behavioral models are described: They are clearly distinct in terms of individual behaviors, they all reproduce satisfactorily the collective dynamics and distribution patterns observed in experiments, and we show theoretically that it is strictly impossible to discriminate two of these models even in the limit of an infinite amount of data whatever the accuracy level. A set of methodological steps are then listed and discussed as practical ways to partially overcome this problem. They involve complementary experimental protocols specifically designed to address the behavioral rules successively, conserving group-level data for the overall model validation. In this context, we highlight the importance of maintaining a sharp distinction between model enunciation, with explicit references to validated biological concepts, and formal translation of these concepts in terms of quantitative state variables and fittable functional dependences. Illustrative examples are provided of the benefits expected during the often long and difficult process of refining a behavioral model, designing adapted experimental protocols and inversing model parameters.
format article
author Sebastian Weitz
Stéphane Blanco
Richard Fournier
Jacques Gautrais
Christian Jost
Guy Theraulaz
author_facet Sebastian Weitz
Stéphane Blanco
Richard Fournier
Jacques Gautrais
Christian Jost
Guy Theraulaz
author_sort Sebastian Weitz
title Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
title_short Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
title_full Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
title_fullStr Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
title_full_unstemmed Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
title_sort modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/6f18f18c0e344b71a54157e2d7919e28
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianweitz modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT stephaneblanco modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT richardfournier modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT jacquesgautrais modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT christianjost modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT guytheraulaz modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
_version_ 1718423732191494144