Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis

ABSTRACT Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many stud...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenna Hicks, Jessica Dewey, Michael Abebe, Yaniv Brandvain, Anita Schuchardt
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6f46b58ffdad4692a6eff55db8683ae2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6f46b58ffdad4692a6eff55db8683ae2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6f46b58ffdad4692a6eff55db8683ae22021-11-15T15:04:51ZPaired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis10.1128/jmbe.00112-211935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/6f46b58ffdad4692a6eff55db8683ae22021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885ABSTRACT Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students struggle to correctly apply a quantitative understanding of variation to statistically analyze data. We present quantitative and qualitative analyses of introductory biology students’ responses on two pairs of multiple-choice questions querying two concepts related to the quantitative analysis of variation. More students correctly identify a mathematical expression of variation than correctly interpret it. Many students correctly interpret a nonsignificant p-value in the context of a very small sample size, but fewer students do so in the context of a large sample size. These results imply that many students have an incomplete quantitative understanding of variation. These findings suggest that instruction focusing on conceptual understanding, not procedural problem solving, may elevate students’ quantitative understanding of variation.Jenna HicksJessica DeweyMichael AbebeYaniv BrandvainAnita SchuchardtAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleeducationassessmentsstatisticsundergraduatevariationSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 22, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic education
assessments
statistics
undergraduate
variation
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle education
assessments
statistics
undergraduate
variation
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Jenna Hicks
Jessica Dewey
Michael Abebe
Yaniv Brandvain
Anita Schuchardt
Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
description ABSTRACT Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students struggle to correctly apply a quantitative understanding of variation to statistically analyze data. We present quantitative and qualitative analyses of introductory biology students’ responses on two pairs of multiple-choice questions querying two concepts related to the quantitative analysis of variation. More students correctly identify a mathematical expression of variation than correctly interpret it. Many students correctly interpret a nonsignificant p-value in the context of a very small sample size, but fewer students do so in the context of a large sample size. These results imply that many students have an incomplete quantitative understanding of variation. These findings suggest that instruction focusing on conceptual understanding, not procedural problem solving, may elevate students’ quantitative understanding of variation.
format article
author Jenna Hicks
Jessica Dewey
Michael Abebe
Yaniv Brandvain
Anita Schuchardt
author_facet Jenna Hicks
Jessica Dewey
Michael Abebe
Yaniv Brandvain
Anita Schuchardt
author_sort Jenna Hicks
title Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_short Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_full Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_fullStr Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_sort paired multiple-choice questions reveal students’ incomplete statistical thinking about variation during data analysis
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6f46b58ffdad4692a6eff55db8683ae2
work_keys_str_mv AT jennahicks pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT jessicadewey pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT michaelabebe pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT yanivbrandvain pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT anitaschuchardt pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
_version_ 1718428196188192768