Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law

<p>The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of the final dissertation projects approved and available to the public between 2005 and 2016, corresponding to the Specialization program in Administrative Law of the Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences of the Central University of V...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Élide Hernández
Formato: article
Lenguaje:ES
Publicado: Universidad Central de Venezuela 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6f4773b0d89c43d09ec30a7ba2392ece
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6f4773b0d89c43d09ec30a7ba2392ece
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6f4773b0d89c43d09ec30a7ba2392ece2021-11-25T23:41:44ZMethodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law2542-3142https://doaj.org/article/6f4773b0d89c43d09ec30a7ba2392ece2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_GID/article/view/22649https://doaj.org/toc/2542-3142<p>The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of the final dissertation projects approved and available to the public between 2005 and 2016, corresponding to the Specialization program in Administrative Law of the Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences of the Central University of Venezuela. The analysis was carried out in terms of the methodological quality of its criteria: completeness, coherence, suitability, originality, and relevance. The study was based on analytical research, supported by a mixed design: longitudinal and evolutionary, and univariate and documentary. The units of analysis were made up of the dissertations of the aforementioned program approved in the indicated period. For data collection purposes, a documental review technique was used, and the comprehensive research analysis matrix was applied as an instrument. The data was analyzed by combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. Content analysis allowed the researchers to interpret and search for the meaning of the information, according to the results obtained and expressed in quantitative terms. The quality criteria were present in the dissertations with the following median: suitability 4.66; coherence 2.5; completeness 2.0; relevance and originality 0. Methodological quality obtained a median of 2.50. These results place the criteria and quality in the &ldquo;very low&rdquo; category, which shows a low level of methodological quality present in the content of the analyzed dissertations.</p> <p>&nbsp;<strong>Key words</strong>: research training; research methodology; methodological quality criteria; research; university</p>Élide HernándezUniversidad Central de VenezuelaarticleManagement. Industrial managementHD28-70BusinessHF5001-6182ESRevista Gestión I+D, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 115-145 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language ES
topic Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Business
HF5001-6182
spellingShingle Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Business
HF5001-6182
Élide Hernández
Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
description <p>The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of the final dissertation projects approved and available to the public between 2005 and 2016, corresponding to the Specialization program in Administrative Law of the Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences of the Central University of Venezuela. The analysis was carried out in terms of the methodological quality of its criteria: completeness, coherence, suitability, originality, and relevance. The study was based on analytical research, supported by a mixed design: longitudinal and evolutionary, and univariate and documentary. The units of analysis were made up of the dissertations of the aforementioned program approved in the indicated period. For data collection purposes, a documental review technique was used, and the comprehensive research analysis matrix was applied as an instrument. The data was analyzed by combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. Content analysis allowed the researchers to interpret and search for the meaning of the information, according to the results obtained and expressed in quantitative terms. The quality criteria were present in the dissertations with the following median: suitability 4.66; coherence 2.5; completeness 2.0; relevance and originality 0. Methodological quality obtained a median of 2.50. These results place the criteria and quality in the &ldquo;very low&rdquo; category, which shows a low level of methodological quality present in the content of the analyzed dissertations.</p> <p>&nbsp;<strong>Key words</strong>: research training; research methodology; methodological quality criteria; research; university</p>
format article
author Élide Hernández
author_facet Élide Hernández
author_sort Élide Hernández
title Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
title_short Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
title_full Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
title_fullStr Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
title_full_unstemmed Methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
title_sort methodological quality criteria in the final dissertations of the degree in administrative law
publisher Universidad Central de Venezuela
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6f4773b0d89c43d09ec30a7ba2392ece
work_keys_str_mv AT elidehernandez methodologicalqualitycriteriainthefinaldissertationsofthedegreeinadministrativelaw
_version_ 1718410037379989504