Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative

Manzini and Savoia (1999, 2001, 2002, to appear) argue that the basic facts about the clitic string are best accounted for without having recourse to anything but a minimalist syntactic compo- nent, i.e. making no use of a specialized morphological component nor of optimality-type com- parisons betw...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rita Manzini, Leonardo M. Savoia
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	CA EN
Publicado:	Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2002
Materias:	clitics Case mutual exclusion suppletion dative locative Philology. Linguistics P1-1091
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6f480bb3bf3a49a590adec0e0a974f38
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6f480bb3bf3a49a590adec0e0a974f38
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6f480bb3bf3a49a590adec0e0a974f382021-11-27T10:49:45ZClitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative10.5565/rev/catjl.571695-68852014-9719https://doaj.org/article/6f480bb3bf3a49a590adec0e0a974f382002-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/catJL/article/view/57https://doaj.org/toc/1695-6885https://doaj.org/toc/2014-9719Manzini and Savoia (1999, 2001, 2002, to appear) argue that the basic facts about the clitic string are best accounted for without having recourse to anything but a minimalist syntactic compo- nent, i.e. making no use of a specialized morphological component nor of optimality-type com- parisons between derivations/ representations. In particular, they assume that clitics correspond to specialized inflectional categories, and are merged directly into the positions where they surface; such categories are furthermore ordered in a universal hierarchy, as we will detail below. The aim of the present paper is to consider datives in the light of this framework. We will conclude that there is no evidence for the category dative in the Romance dialects we shall consider, while in fact there is evidence for categorizations of so-called dative clitics as quantificational elements or as deictic elements (locatives). In all cases, the relevant categorization relies entirely on referential properties, or more generally on interpretive properties intrinsic to the lexical items involved, calling into question the traditional notion of Case itself.Rita ManziniLeonardo M. SavoiaUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaarticlecliticsCasemutual exclusionsuppletiondativelocativePhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091CAENCatalan Journal of Linguistics, Vol 1 (2002)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	CA EN
topic	clitics Case mutual exclusion suppletion dative locative Philology. Linguistics P1-1091
spellingShingle	clitics Case mutual exclusion suppletion dative locative Philology. Linguistics P1-1091 Rita Manzini Leonardo M. Savoia Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative
description	Manzini and Savoia (1999, 2001, 2002, to appear) argue that the basic facts about the clitic string are best accounted for without having recourse to anything but a minimalist syntactic compo- nent, i.e. making no use of a specialized morphological component nor of optimality-type com- parisons between derivations/ representations. In particular, they assume that clitics correspond to specialized inflectional categories, and are merged directly into the positions where they surface; such categories are furthermore ordered in a universal hierarchy, as we will detail below. The aim of the present paper is to consider datives in the light of this framework. We will conclude that there is no evidence for the category dative in the Romance dialects we shall consider, while in fact there is evidence for categorizations of so-called dative clitics as quantificational elements or as deictic elements (locatives). In all cases, the relevant categorization relies entirely on referential properties, or more generally on interpretive properties intrinsic to the lexical items involved, calling into question the traditional notion of Case itself.
format	article
author	Rita Manzini Leonardo M. Savoia
author_facet	Rita Manzini Leonardo M. Savoia
author_sort	Rita Manzini
title	Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative
title_short	Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative
title_full	Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative
title_fullStr	Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative
title_full_unstemmed	Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative
title_sort	clitics: lexicalization patterns of the so-called 3rd person dative
publisher	Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
publishDate	2002
url	https://doaj.org/article/6f480bb3bf3a49a590adec0e0a974f38
work_keys_str_mv	AT ritamanzini cliticslexicalizationpatternsofthesocalled3rdpersondative AT leonardomsavoia cliticslexicalizationpatternsofthesocalled3rdpersondative
_version_	1718408992346079232

Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative

Ejemplares similares