Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process

Abstract Background Clinical reasoning is a crucial task within the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) care process. Both contextual and cognitive factors make the task susceptible to errors. Understanding the EMS care process’ structure could help identify and address issues that interfere with clini...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bert Dercksen, Michel M. R. F. Struys, Fokie Cnossen, Wolter Paans
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6f4d487266e042e3bbd9c16db64b6d4b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6f4d487266e042e3bbd9c16db64b6d4b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6f4d487266e042e3bbd9c16db64b6d4b2021-11-14T12:15:57ZQualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process10.1186/s12873-021-00526-z1471-227Xhttps://doaj.org/article/6f4d487266e042e3bbd9c16db64b6d4b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00526-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/1471-227XAbstract Background Clinical reasoning is a crucial task within the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) care process. Both contextual and cognitive factors make the task susceptible to errors. Understanding the EMS care process’ structure could help identify and address issues that interfere with clinical reasoning. The EMS care process is complex and only basically described. In this research, we aimed to define the different phases of the process and develop an overarching model that can help detect and correct potential error sources, improve clinical reasoning and optimize patient care. Methods We conducted a focused ethnography study utilizing non-participant video observations of real-life EMS deployments combined with thematic analysis of peer interviews. After an initial qualitative analysis of 7 video observations, we formulated a tentative conceptual model of the EMS care process. To test and refine this model, we carried out a qualitative, thematic analysis of 28 video-recorded cases. We validated the resulting model by evaluating its recognizability with a peer content analysis utilizing semi-structured interviews. Results Based on real-life observations, we were able to define and validate a model covering the distinct phases of an EMS deployment. We have introduced the acronym “SPART” to describe ten different phases: Start, Situation, Prologue, Presentation, Anamnesis, Assessment, Reasoning, Resolution, Treatment, and Transfer. Conclusions The “SPART” model describes the EMS care process and helps to understand it. We expect it to facilitate identifying and addressing factors that influence both the care process and the clinical reasoning task embedded in this process.Bert DercksenMichel M. R. F. StruysFokie CnossenWolter PaansBMCarticleSPARTEmergency medical servicesEMS care processParamedic processAmbulancesSpecial situations and conditionsRC952-1245Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aidRC86-88.9ENBMC Emergency Medicine, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic SPART
Emergency medical services
EMS care process
Paramedic process
Ambulances
Special situations and conditions
RC952-1245
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
spellingShingle SPART
Emergency medical services
EMS care process
Paramedic process
Ambulances
Special situations and conditions
RC952-1245
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
Bert Dercksen
Michel M. R. F. Struys
Fokie Cnossen
Wolter Paans
Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
description Abstract Background Clinical reasoning is a crucial task within the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) care process. Both contextual and cognitive factors make the task susceptible to errors. Understanding the EMS care process’ structure could help identify and address issues that interfere with clinical reasoning. The EMS care process is complex and only basically described. In this research, we aimed to define the different phases of the process and develop an overarching model that can help detect and correct potential error sources, improve clinical reasoning and optimize patient care. Methods We conducted a focused ethnography study utilizing non-participant video observations of real-life EMS deployments combined with thematic analysis of peer interviews. After an initial qualitative analysis of 7 video observations, we formulated a tentative conceptual model of the EMS care process. To test and refine this model, we carried out a qualitative, thematic analysis of 28 video-recorded cases. We validated the resulting model by evaluating its recognizability with a peer content analysis utilizing semi-structured interviews. Results Based on real-life observations, we were able to define and validate a model covering the distinct phases of an EMS deployment. We have introduced the acronym “SPART” to describe ten different phases: Start, Situation, Prologue, Presentation, Anamnesis, Assessment, Reasoning, Resolution, Treatment, and Transfer. Conclusions The “SPART” model describes the EMS care process and helps to understand it. We expect it to facilitate identifying and addressing factors that influence both the care process and the clinical reasoning task embedded in this process.
format article
author Bert Dercksen
Michel M. R. F. Struys
Fokie Cnossen
Wolter Paans
author_facet Bert Dercksen
Michel M. R. F. Struys
Fokie Cnossen
Wolter Paans
author_sort Bert Dercksen
title Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
title_short Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
title_full Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
title_fullStr Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative development and content validation of the “SPART” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
title_sort qualitative development and content validation of the “spart” model; a focused ethnography study of observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in the emergency medical services care process
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6f4d487266e042e3bbd9c16db64b6d4b
work_keys_str_mv AT bertdercksen qualitativedevelopmentandcontentvalidationofthespartmodelafocusedethnographystudyofobservablediagnosticandtherapeuticactivitiesintheemergencymedicalservicescareprocess
AT michelmrfstruys qualitativedevelopmentandcontentvalidationofthespartmodelafocusedethnographystudyofobservablediagnosticandtherapeuticactivitiesintheemergencymedicalservicescareprocess
AT fokiecnossen qualitativedevelopmentandcontentvalidationofthespartmodelafocusedethnographystudyofobservablediagnosticandtherapeuticactivitiesintheemergencymedicalservicescareprocess
AT wolterpaans qualitativedevelopmentandcontentvalidationofthespartmodelafocusedethnographystudyofobservablediagnosticandtherapeuticactivitiesintheemergencymedicalservicescareprocess
_version_ 1718429352048197632