Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for confirming head injury diagnoses. However, there is no standard clinical decision rule (CDR) for determining the need for CT scanning in pediatric patients with head injuries. We developed a CDR and conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naoki Yogo, Chiaki Toida, Takashi Muguruma, Masayasu Gakumazawa, Mafumi Shinohara, Ichiro Takeuchi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6f6bdfe6fed34471ae6d1ce353416990
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6f6bdfe6fed34471ae6d1ce353416990
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6f6bdfe6fed34471ae6d1ce3534169902021-11-25T18:00:51ZSimplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study10.3390/jcm102252482077-0383https://doaj.org/article/6f6bdfe6fed34471ae6d1ce3534169902021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/22/5248https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for confirming head injury diagnoses. However, there is no standard clinical decision rule (CDR) for determining the need for CT scanning in pediatric patients with head injuries. We developed a CDR and conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI). We selected predictors based on three existing CDRs: CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN. Of the 2569 eligible patients, 645 (439 (68%) boys, median age: five years) were included in this study. In total, 59 (9%) patients showed ciTBI, and 129 (20%) were admitted to hospital. The novel CDR comprised six predictors of abnormal CT findings. It had a sensitivity of 79.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.5–89.0%) and a specificity of 50.9% (95% CI: 48.9–52.3%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77) was non-inferior to those of CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN (0.71, 95% CI: 0.66–0.77; 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.74; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64–0.73, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.57). The novel CDR was statistically noninferior in diagnostic accuracy compared to the three existing CDRs. Further development and validation studies are needed before clinical application.Naoki YogoChiaki ToidaTakashi MugurumaMasayasu GakumazawaMafumi ShinoharaIchiro TakeuchiMDPI AGarticlepediatricsemergency departmentclinically important traumatic brain injuryMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5248, p 5248 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic pediatrics
emergency department
clinically important traumatic brain injury
Medicine
R
spellingShingle pediatrics
emergency department
clinically important traumatic brain injury
Medicine
R
Naoki Yogo
Chiaki Toida
Takashi Muguruma
Masayasu Gakumazawa
Mafumi Shinohara
Ichiro Takeuchi
Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
description Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for confirming head injury diagnoses. However, there is no standard clinical decision rule (CDR) for determining the need for CT scanning in pediatric patients with head injuries. We developed a CDR and conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI). We selected predictors based on three existing CDRs: CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN. Of the 2569 eligible patients, 645 (439 (68%) boys, median age: five years) were included in this study. In total, 59 (9%) patients showed ciTBI, and 129 (20%) were admitted to hospital. The novel CDR comprised six predictors of abnormal CT findings. It had a sensitivity of 79.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.5–89.0%) and a specificity of 50.9% (95% CI: 48.9–52.3%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77) was non-inferior to those of CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN (0.71, 95% CI: 0.66–0.77; 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.74; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64–0.73, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.57). The novel CDR was statistically noninferior in diagnostic accuracy compared to the three existing CDRs. Further development and validation studies are needed before clinical application.
format article
author Naoki Yogo
Chiaki Toida
Takashi Muguruma
Masayasu Gakumazawa
Mafumi Shinohara
Ichiro Takeuchi
author_facet Naoki Yogo
Chiaki Toida
Takashi Muguruma
Masayasu Gakumazawa
Mafumi Shinohara
Ichiro Takeuchi
author_sort Naoki Yogo
title Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort simplified clinical decision rule using clinically important events for risk prediction in pediatric head injury: a retrospective cohort study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6f6bdfe6fed34471ae6d1ce353416990
work_keys_str_mv AT naokiyogo simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chiakitoida simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT takashimuguruma simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT masayasugakumazawa simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mafumishinohara simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ichirotakeuchi simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1718411749333401600