Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance

Ever since the 2015 migration and asylum crisis, the legal regulation of this field in the European Union has been debated strongly in almost all its aspects. The member countries of the Visegrád Group (V4) have voiced dissent regarding a number of EU measures in this field, leading to political and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Mohay Ágoston
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	CS EN SK
Publicado:	Sciendo 2021
Materias:	migration and asylum law european union visegrád group new pact on migration and asylum Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6f784d3b7a754450adc1bc9ff2db3a11
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6f784d3b7a754450adc1bc9ff2db3a11
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6f784d3b7a754450adc1bc9ff2db3a112021-12-05T14:11:09ZMigration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance1801-342210.2478/pce-2021-0031https://doaj.org/article/6f784d3b7a754450adc1bc9ff2db3a112021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2021-0031https://doaj.org/toc/1801-3422Ever since the 2015 migration and asylum crisis, the legal regulation of this field in the European Union has been debated strongly in almost all its aspects. The member countries of the Visegrád Group (V4) have voiced dissent regarding a number of EU measures in this field, leading to political and legal confrontation. After a brief review of the public law context of EU migration and asylum policy and the general attitude of the V4 towards these regulatory fields, this paper elaborates how the EU and the V4 reacted – in legal terms – to the 2015 migration and asylum crisis and to each other’s measures, focusing on three key V4 policy goals. The paper also analyses the reception of the 2020 proposal on the New Pact on Migration and Asylum and discusses whether it can be seen as the way forward in terms of a more consensual policy approach. The paper finds that although the approach of the V4 has had a perceivable effect on that of the EU, elements of disagreement remain; it further argues that the harmonious elements of the approaches of the EU and the V4 could potentially be built upon to reach a compromise, but maintains that policy-based reluctance cannot have an effect on obligations laid down by EU law.Mohay ÁgostonSciendoarticlemigration and asylum laweuropean unionvisegrád groupnew pact on migration and asylumPolitical scienceJCSENSKPolitics in Central Europe, Vol 17, Iss s1, Pp 761-790 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	CS EN SK
topic	migration and asylum law european union visegrád group new pact on migration and asylum Political science J
spellingShingle	migration and asylum law european union visegrád group new pact on migration and asylum Political science J Mohay Ágoston Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
description	Ever since the 2015 migration and asylum crisis, the legal regulation of this field in the European Union has been debated strongly in almost all its aspects. The member countries of the Visegrád Group (V4) have voiced dissent regarding a number of EU measures in this field, leading to political and legal confrontation. After a brief review of the public law context of EU migration and asylum policy and the general attitude of the V4 towards these regulatory fields, this paper elaborates how the EU and the V4 reacted – in legal terms – to the 2015 migration and asylum crisis and to each other’s measures, focusing on three key V4 policy goals. The paper also analyses the reception of the 2020 proposal on the New Pact on Migration and Asylum and discusses whether it can be seen as the way forward in terms of a more consensual policy approach. The paper finds that although the approach of the V4 has had a perceivable effect on that of the EU, elements of disagreement remain; it further argues that the harmonious elements of the approaches of the EU and the V4 could potentially be built upon to reach a compromise, but maintains that policy-based reluctance cannot have an effect on obligations laid down by EU law.
format	article
author	Mohay Ágoston
author_facet	Mohay Ágoston
author_sort	Mohay Ágoston
title	Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
title_short	Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
title_full	Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
title_fullStr	Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
title_full_unstemmed	Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
title_sort	migration and asylum law of the v4 in the european union context: between harmonisation and reluctance
publisher	Sciendo
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/6f784d3b7a754450adc1bc9ff2db3a11
work_keys_str_mv	AT mohayagoston migrationandasylumlawofthev4intheeuropeanunioncontextbetweenharmonisationandreluctance
_version_	1718371363359555584

Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance

Ejemplares similares