Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success

Abstract Reduced competition is a frequent explanation for the success of many introduced species. In benthic marine biofouling communities, space limitation leads to high rates of overgrowth competition. Some species can utilise other living organisms as substrate (epibiosis), proffering a competit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaeden Leonard, Chad L. Hewitt, Marnie L. Campbell, Carmen Primo, Steven D. Miller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6fa1405e123d481dbc83933c4d408608
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6fa1405e123d481dbc83933c4d408608
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6fa1405e123d481dbc83933c4d4086082021-12-02T15:05:29ZEpibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success10.1038/s41598-017-05470-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6fa1405e123d481dbc83933c4d4086082017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05470-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Reduced competition is a frequent explanation for the success of many introduced species. In benthic marine biofouling communities, space limitation leads to high rates of overgrowth competition. Some species can utilise other living organisms as substrate (epibiosis), proffering a competitive advantage for the epibiont. Additionally, some species can prevent or reduce epibiotic settlement on their surfaces and avoid being basibionts. To test whether epibiotic pressure differs between native and introduced species, we undertook ex situ experiments comparing bryozoan larval settlement to determine if introduced species demonstrate a greater propensity to settle as epibionts, and a reduced propensity to be basibionts, than native species. Here we report that introduced species opportunistically settle on any space (bare, native, or introduced), whereas native species exhibit a strong tendency to settle on and near other natives, but avoid settling on or near introduced basibionts. In addition, larvae of native species experience greater larval wastage (mortality) than introduced species, both in the presence and absence of living substrates. Introduced species’ ability to settle on natives as epibionts, and in turn avoid epibiosis as basibionts, combined with significantly enhanced native larval wastage, provides a comprehensive suite of competitive advantages contributing to the invasion success of these biofouling species.Kaeden LeonardChad L. HewittMarnie L. CampbellCarmen PrimoSteven D. MillerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kaeden Leonard
Chad L. Hewitt
Marnie L. Campbell
Carmen Primo
Steven D. Miller
Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
description Abstract Reduced competition is a frequent explanation for the success of many introduced species. In benthic marine biofouling communities, space limitation leads to high rates of overgrowth competition. Some species can utilise other living organisms as substrate (epibiosis), proffering a competitive advantage for the epibiont. Additionally, some species can prevent or reduce epibiotic settlement on their surfaces and avoid being basibionts. To test whether epibiotic pressure differs between native and introduced species, we undertook ex situ experiments comparing bryozoan larval settlement to determine if introduced species demonstrate a greater propensity to settle as epibionts, and a reduced propensity to be basibionts, than native species. Here we report that introduced species opportunistically settle on any space (bare, native, or introduced), whereas native species exhibit a strong tendency to settle on and near other natives, but avoid settling on or near introduced basibionts. In addition, larvae of native species experience greater larval wastage (mortality) than introduced species, both in the presence and absence of living substrates. Introduced species’ ability to settle on natives as epibionts, and in turn avoid epibiosis as basibionts, combined with significantly enhanced native larval wastage, provides a comprehensive suite of competitive advantages contributing to the invasion success of these biofouling species.
format article
author Kaeden Leonard
Chad L. Hewitt
Marnie L. Campbell
Carmen Primo
Steven D. Miller
author_facet Kaeden Leonard
Chad L. Hewitt
Marnie L. Campbell
Carmen Primo
Steven D. Miller
author_sort Kaeden Leonard
title Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
title_short Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
title_full Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
title_fullStr Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
title_full_unstemmed Epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
title_sort epibiotic pressure contributes to biofouling invader success
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/6fa1405e123d481dbc83933c4d408608
work_keys_str_mv AT kaedenleonard epibioticpressurecontributestobiofoulinginvadersuccess
AT chadlhewitt epibioticpressurecontributestobiofoulinginvadersuccess
AT marnielcampbell epibioticpressurecontributestobiofoulinginvadersuccess
AT carmenprimo epibioticpressurecontributestobiofoulinginvadersuccess
AT stevendmiller epibioticpressurecontributestobiofoulinginvadersuccess
_version_ 1718388836911808512