A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health

Background: The WHO Africa Region faces a shortage of health workers due to inadequate production of health workers and emigration of physicians and nurses to wealthier countries. South Africa and the United States share a history of discriminatory policies and practices resulting in groups that are...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalay Moodley, Tabia Henry Akintobi, Therese Fish, Daniel S. Blumenthal
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6fa2e2f022bd4089aba37d778e368fca
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6fa2e2f022bd4089aba37d778e368fca
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6fa2e2f022bd4089aba37d778e368fca2021-12-02T04:01:28ZA Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health2214-999610.29024/aogh.12https://doaj.org/article/6fa2e2f022bd4089aba37d778e368fca2018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/12https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: The WHO Africa Region faces a shortage of health workers due to inadequate production of health workers and emigration of physicians and nurses to wealthier countries. South Africa and the United States share a history of discriminatory policies and practices resulting in groups that are under-represented amongst health professionals. One US response is the Area Health Education Centers Program (AHEC), a pipeline program to recruit members of under-represented groups into the health professions. Objectives: (1) Compare and contrast the United States’ AHEC model with that developed in South Africa by Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences SA AHEC in partnership with Morehouse School of Medicine in the United States. (2) Describe a formative evaluation of the Stellenbosch AHEC Program. Methods: Four hundred students (grades 7–12) and 150 teachers participated in SA AHEC with the goal of preparing the students to better compete for university admission. Students received after-school tutoring, holiday schools, and counselling on study skills, health careers, and university entry. Educators received continuing professional education, classroom observation, and feedback. The program was evaluated through a series of interviews and focus groups involving AHEC staff, educators, and parents and caregivers. Results: Program strengths included educator training, collaboration, and increased student maturity, motivation, and academic success. Challenges included limited time with students, the location of some sites, and the educators’ need for more engagement with AHEC staff and schools. Quarterly workshops were conducted to address challenges. Over 50% of program alumni are currently enrolled in institutions of higher education. Students will be tracked to determine whether they are able to complete their health professions studies and return to the communities where they grew up, or to similar communities. Conclusions: With appropriate adaptation and attention to context, it might be possible to implement similar programmes in other African countries. The comparison of the United States and South African models suggested that more parent and teacher participation in an advisory capacity might help to avoid some challenges.Kalay MoodleyTabia Henry AkintobiTherese FishDaniel S. BlumenthalUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 84, Iss 1, Pp 66-76 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Kalay Moodley
Tabia Henry Akintobi
Therese Fish
Daniel S. Blumenthal
A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health
description Background: The WHO Africa Region faces a shortage of health workers due to inadequate production of health workers and emigration of physicians and nurses to wealthier countries. South Africa and the United States share a history of discriminatory policies and practices resulting in groups that are under-represented amongst health professionals. One US response is the Area Health Education Centers Program (AHEC), a pipeline program to recruit members of under-represented groups into the health professions. Objectives: (1) Compare and contrast the United States’ AHEC model with that developed in South Africa by Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences SA AHEC in partnership with Morehouse School of Medicine in the United States. (2) Describe a formative evaluation of the Stellenbosch AHEC Program. Methods: Four hundred students (grades 7–12) and 150 teachers participated in SA AHEC with the goal of preparing the students to better compete for university admission. Students received after-school tutoring, holiday schools, and counselling on study skills, health careers, and university entry. Educators received continuing professional education, classroom observation, and feedback. The program was evaluated through a series of interviews and focus groups involving AHEC staff, educators, and parents and caregivers. Results: Program strengths included educator training, collaboration, and increased student maturity, motivation, and academic success. Challenges included limited time with students, the location of some sites, and the educators’ need for more engagement with AHEC staff and schools. Quarterly workshops were conducted to address challenges. Over 50% of program alumni are currently enrolled in institutions of higher education. Students will be tracked to determine whether they are able to complete their health professions studies and return to the communities where they grew up, or to similar communities. Conclusions: With appropriate adaptation and attention to context, it might be possible to implement similar programmes in other African countries. The comparison of the United States and South African models suggested that more parent and teacher participation in an advisory capacity might help to avoid some challenges.
format article
author Kalay Moodley
Tabia Henry Akintobi
Therese Fish
Daniel S. Blumenthal
author_facet Kalay Moodley
Tabia Henry Akintobi
Therese Fish
Daniel S. Blumenthal
author_sort Kalay Moodley
title A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health
title_short A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health
title_full A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health
title_fullStr A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health
title_full_unstemmed A Pipeline Program to Address the South African Crisis in Human Resources for Health
title_sort pipeline program to address the south african crisis in human resources for health
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/6fa2e2f022bd4089aba37d778e368fca
work_keys_str_mv AT kalaymoodley apipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT tabiahenryakintobi apipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT theresefish apipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT danielsblumenthal apipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT kalaymoodley pipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT tabiahenryakintobi pipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT theresefish pipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
AT danielsblumenthal pipelineprogramtoaddressthesouthafricancrisisinhumanresourcesforhealth
_version_ 1718401494898704384