Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>The recent Lancet Commission on Legal Determinants of Global Health argues that governance can provide the framework for achieving sustainable development goals. Even though over 90% of fatal road traffic injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) prima...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob R Lepard, Riccardo Spagiari, Jacquelyn Corley, Ernest J Barthélemy, Eliana Kim, Rolvix Patterson, Sara Venturini, Megan E H Still, Yu Tung Lo, Gail Rosseau, Rania A Mekary, Kee B Park
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6fe8176310f34dc3a79f875d8ba46197
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6fe8176310f34dc3a79f875d8ba46197
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6fe8176310f34dc3a79f875d8ba461972021-12-02T19:56:04ZDifferences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1003795https://doaj.org/article/6fe8176310f34dc3a79f875d8ba461972021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003795https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>The recent Lancet Commission on Legal Determinants of Global Health argues that governance can provide the framework for achieving sustainable development goals. Even though over 90% of fatal road traffic injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) primarily affecting motorcyclists, the utility of helmet laws outside of high-income settings has not been well characterized. We sought to evaluate the differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation and determine whether these varied across country income levels.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis were completed using the PRISMA checklist. A search for relevant articles was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 1990 to August 8, 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated helmet usage, mortality from motorcycle crash, or traumatic brain injury (TBI) incidence, with and without enactment of a mandatory helmet law as the intervention. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to rate study quality and funnel plots, and Begg's and Egger's tests were used to assess for small study bias. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were stratified by high-income countries (HICs) versus LMICs using the random-effects model. Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis encompassing a total study population of 31,949,418 people. There were 17 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 case-control study, and 5 pre-post design studies. There were 16 studies from HICs and 9 from LMICs. The median NOS score was 6 with a range of 4 to 9. All studies demonstrated higher odds of helmet usage after implementation of helmet law; however, the results were statistically significantly greater in HICs (OR: 53.5; 95% CI: 28.4; 100.7) than in LMICs (OR: 4.82; 95% CI: 3.58; 6.49), p-value comparing both strata < 0.0001. There were significantly lower odds of motorcycle fatalities after enactment of helmet legislation (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61; 0.83) with no significant difference by income classification, p-value: 0.27. Odds of TBI were statistically significantly lower in HICs (OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) than in LMICs (0.79, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.86) after enactment of law (p-value: 0.0001). Limitations of this study include variability in the methodologies and data sources in the studies included in the meta-analysis as well as the lack of available literature from the lowest income countries or from the African WHO region, in which helmet laws are least commonly present.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In this study, we observed that mandatory helmet laws had substantial public health benefits in all income contexts, but some outcomes were diminished in LMIC settings where additional measures such as public education and law enforcement might play critical roles.Jacob R LepardRiccardo SpagiariJacquelyn CorleyErnest J BarthélemyEliana KimRolvix PattersonSara VenturiniMegan E H StillYu Tung LoGail RosseauRania A MekaryKee B ParkPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 18, Iss 9, p e1003795 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Jacob R Lepard
Riccardo Spagiari
Jacquelyn Corley
Ernest J Barthélemy
Eliana Kim
Rolvix Patterson
Sara Venturini
Megan E H Still
Yu Tung Lo
Gail Rosseau
Rania A Mekary
Kee B Park
Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
description <h4>Background</h4>The recent Lancet Commission on Legal Determinants of Global Health argues that governance can provide the framework for achieving sustainable development goals. Even though over 90% of fatal road traffic injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) primarily affecting motorcyclists, the utility of helmet laws outside of high-income settings has not been well characterized. We sought to evaluate the differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation and determine whether these varied across country income levels.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis were completed using the PRISMA checklist. A search for relevant articles was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 1990 to August 8, 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated helmet usage, mortality from motorcycle crash, or traumatic brain injury (TBI) incidence, with and without enactment of a mandatory helmet law as the intervention. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to rate study quality and funnel plots, and Begg's and Egger's tests were used to assess for small study bias. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were stratified by high-income countries (HICs) versus LMICs using the random-effects model. Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis encompassing a total study population of 31,949,418 people. There were 17 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 case-control study, and 5 pre-post design studies. There were 16 studies from HICs and 9 from LMICs. The median NOS score was 6 with a range of 4 to 9. All studies demonstrated higher odds of helmet usage after implementation of helmet law; however, the results were statistically significantly greater in HICs (OR: 53.5; 95% CI: 28.4; 100.7) than in LMICs (OR: 4.82; 95% CI: 3.58; 6.49), p-value comparing both strata < 0.0001. There were significantly lower odds of motorcycle fatalities after enactment of helmet legislation (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61; 0.83) with no significant difference by income classification, p-value: 0.27. Odds of TBI were statistically significantly lower in HICs (OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) than in LMICs (0.79, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.86) after enactment of law (p-value: 0.0001). Limitations of this study include variability in the methodologies and data sources in the studies included in the meta-analysis as well as the lack of available literature from the lowest income countries or from the African WHO region, in which helmet laws are least commonly present.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In this study, we observed that mandatory helmet laws had substantial public health benefits in all income contexts, but some outcomes were diminished in LMIC settings where additional measures such as public education and law enforcement might play critical roles.
format article
author Jacob R Lepard
Riccardo Spagiari
Jacquelyn Corley
Ernest J Barthélemy
Eliana Kim
Rolvix Patterson
Sara Venturini
Megan E H Still
Yu Tung Lo
Gail Rosseau
Rania A Mekary
Kee B Park
author_facet Jacob R Lepard
Riccardo Spagiari
Jacquelyn Corley
Ernest J Barthélemy
Eliana Kim
Rolvix Patterson
Sara Venturini
Megan E H Still
Yu Tung Lo
Gail Rosseau
Rania A Mekary
Kee B Park
author_sort Jacob R Lepard
title Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort differences in outcomes of mandatory motorcycle helmet legislation by country income level: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6fe8176310f34dc3a79f875d8ba46197
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobrlepard differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT riccardospagiari differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jacquelyncorley differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ernestjbarthelemy differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elianakim differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rolvixpatterson differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saraventurini differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meganehstill differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yutunglo differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gailrosseau differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raniaamekary differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT keebpark differencesinoutcomesofmandatorymotorcyclehelmetlegislationbycountryincomelevelasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718375846135201792