Political Myths in Plato and Asimov
Works of science fiction tend to describe hypothetical futures, or counterfactual pasts or presents, to entertain their readers. Philosophical thought experiments tend to describe counterfactual situations to test their readers’ philosophical intuitions. Indeed, works of science fiction can sometime...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Alfredo Mac Laughlin
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7013fb68d5bf4b94acf5d0d65de50b71 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7013fb68d5bf4b94acf5d0d65de50b71 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7013fb68d5bf4b94acf5d0d65de50b712021-11-11T21:30:30ZPolitical Myths in Plato and Asimov2573-881Xhttps://doaj.org/article/7013fb68d5bf4b94acf5d0d65de50b712019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jsfphil.org/vol-2/vol-2-political-myths/https://doaj.org/toc/2573-881XWorks of science fiction tend to describe hypothetical futures, or counterfactual pasts or presents, to entertain their readers. Philosophical thought experiments tend to describe counterfactual situations to test their readers’ philosophical intuitions. Indeed, works of science fiction can sometimes be read as containing thought experiments. I compare one especially famous thought experiment from Plato’s Republic with what I read as two thought experiments from Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy. All three thought experiments concern myths used in political contexts, and comparing them permits me to analyze the morality of political mythologizing.Nathaniel GoldbergAlfredo Mac LaughlinarticlePhilosophy (General)B1-5802Literature (General)PN1-6790ENJournal of Science Fiction and Philosophy, Vol 2, Pp 1-19 (2019) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Literature (General) PN1-6790 |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Literature (General) PN1-6790 Nathaniel Goldberg Political Myths in Plato and Asimov |
description |
Works of science fiction tend to describe hypothetical futures, or counterfactual pasts or presents, to entertain their readers. Philosophical thought experiments tend to describe counterfactual situations to test their readers’ philosophical intuitions. Indeed, works of science fiction can sometimes be read as containing thought experiments. I compare one especially famous thought experiment from Plato’s Republic with what I read as two thought experiments from Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy. All three thought experiments concern myths used in political contexts, and comparing them permits me to analyze the morality of political mythologizing. |
format |
article |
author |
Nathaniel Goldberg |
author_facet |
Nathaniel Goldberg |
author_sort |
Nathaniel Goldberg |
title |
Political Myths in Plato and Asimov |
title_short |
Political Myths in Plato and Asimov |
title_full |
Political Myths in Plato and Asimov |
title_fullStr |
Political Myths in Plato and Asimov |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political Myths in Plato and Asimov |
title_sort |
political myths in plato and asimov |
publisher |
Alfredo Mac Laughlin |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7013fb68d5bf4b94acf5d0d65de50b71 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nathanielgoldberg politicalmythsinplatoandasimov |
_version_ |
1718431356410658816 |