Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD

Background: Interference control is the cognitive control needed to prevent interference due to competition of relevant and irrelevant information that closely related to working memory. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial work...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thitiya Wangkawan, Cynthia Lai, Peeraya Munkhetvit, Trevor Yung, Supaporn Chinchai
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/701fae268bc943eda010131f42582e61
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:701fae268bc943eda010131f42582e61
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:701fae268bc943eda010131f42582e612021-11-12T10:24:36ZEffects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD1011-456410.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_10_20https://doaj.org/article/701fae268bc943eda010131f42582e612021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jmedscindmc.com/article.asp?issn=1011-4564;year=2021;volume=41;issue=6;spage=265;epage=272;aulast=Wangkawanhttps://doaj.org/toc/1011-4564Background: Interference control is the cognitive control needed to prevent interference due to competition of relevant and irrelevant information that closely related to working memory. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory of children with ADHD. Methods: The participants included thirty children with ADHD and thirty normal control children aged 7–12 years old. All children took the computerized test of visuospatial working memory assessment. The test comprised the N-back and running Memory tasks divided into three conditions: noninterference, auditory interference, and visual interference in three levels of difficulty. Results: The results revealed that there was a significant difference in N-back with auditory interference (t = 2.13, P = 0.04) and N-back with visual interference task (t = 2.48, P = 0.02) between normal control children and children with ADHD. However, there was no significant difference in N-back with noninterference task (t = 1.61, P = 0.11) between normal control children and children with ADHD. There was a significant difference in running memory with noninterference (t = 5.34, P ≤ 0.001), running memory with auditory interference (t = 6.23, P ≤ 0.001), and running memory with visual interference task (t = 5.86, P ≤ 0.001) between normal control children and children with ADHD. In addition, the comparison of the mean score revealed that children with ADHD had poorer performance of interference control on visuospatial working memory tasks than normal control children in overall tasks. Conclusion: Children with ADHD exhibited inefficient control over themselves, especially in the interference condition tasks in which they performed more error responses when interacting in the tasks. The present study supports the evidence-based mechanisms of auditory and visual interference control in visuospatial working memory of children with ADHD.Thitiya WangkawanCynthia LaiPeeraya MunkhetvitTrevor YungSupaporn ChinchaiWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlevisuospatial working memory assessmentvisuospatial working memoryinterference controln-back taskrunning memory taskMedicineRMedical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aidRC86-88.9ENJournal of Medical Sciences, Vol 41, Iss 6, Pp 265-272 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic visuospatial working memory assessment
visuospatial working memory
interference control
n-back task
running memory task
Medicine
R
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
spellingShingle visuospatial working memory assessment
visuospatial working memory
interference control
n-back task
running memory task
Medicine
R
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
Thitiya Wangkawan
Cynthia Lai
Peeraya Munkhetvit
Trevor Yung
Supaporn Chinchai
Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD
description Background: Interference control is the cognitive control needed to prevent interference due to competition of relevant and irrelevant information that closely related to working memory. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory of children with ADHD. Methods: The participants included thirty children with ADHD and thirty normal control children aged 7–12 years old. All children took the computerized test of visuospatial working memory assessment. The test comprised the N-back and running Memory tasks divided into three conditions: noninterference, auditory interference, and visual interference in three levels of difficulty. Results: The results revealed that there was a significant difference in N-back with auditory interference (t = 2.13, P = 0.04) and N-back with visual interference task (t = 2.48, P = 0.02) between normal control children and children with ADHD. However, there was no significant difference in N-back with noninterference task (t = 1.61, P = 0.11) between normal control children and children with ADHD. There was a significant difference in running memory with noninterference (t = 5.34, P ≤ 0.001), running memory with auditory interference (t = 6.23, P ≤ 0.001), and running memory with visual interference task (t = 5.86, P ≤ 0.001) between normal control children and children with ADHD. In addition, the comparison of the mean score revealed that children with ADHD had poorer performance of interference control on visuospatial working memory tasks than normal control children in overall tasks. Conclusion: Children with ADHD exhibited inefficient control over themselves, especially in the interference condition tasks in which they performed more error responses when interacting in the tasks. The present study supports the evidence-based mechanisms of auditory and visual interference control in visuospatial working memory of children with ADHD.
format article
author Thitiya Wangkawan
Cynthia Lai
Peeraya Munkhetvit
Trevor Yung
Supaporn Chinchai
author_facet Thitiya Wangkawan
Cynthia Lai
Peeraya Munkhetvit
Trevor Yung
Supaporn Chinchai
author_sort Thitiya Wangkawan
title Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD
title_short Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD
title_full Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD
title_fullStr Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD
title_full_unstemmed Effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD
title_sort effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with adhd
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/701fae268bc943eda010131f42582e61
work_keys_str_mv AT thitiyawangkawan effectsofauditoryandvisualinterferencecontrolonvisuospatialworkingmemoryinchildrenwithadhd
AT cynthialai effectsofauditoryandvisualinterferencecontrolonvisuospatialworkingmemoryinchildrenwithadhd
AT peerayamunkhetvit effectsofauditoryandvisualinterferencecontrolonvisuospatialworkingmemoryinchildrenwithadhd
AT trevoryung effectsofauditoryandvisualinterferencecontrolonvisuospatialworkingmemoryinchildrenwithadhd
AT supapornchinchai effectsofauditoryandvisualinterferencecontrolonvisuospatialworkingmemoryinchildrenwithadhd
_version_ 1718430994398183424