The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee

Two major inquiries into the Australian news media in 2011 and 2012 prompted a necessary debate over the extent to which rapidly converging and globalised news businesses and platforms require statutory regulation at a national level. Three regulatory models emerged—a News Media Council backed by re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mark Pearson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7057cf5615c4406ebc3d50328f7c23ba
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7057cf5615c4406ebc3d50328f7c23ba
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7057cf5615c4406ebc3d50328f7c23ba2021-12-02T10:24:50ZThe media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee10.24135/pjr.v18i2.2661023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/7057cf5615c4406ebc3d50328f7c23ba2012-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/266https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035Two major inquiries into the Australian news media in 2011 and 2012 prompted a necessary debate over the extent to which rapidly converging and globalised news businesses and platforms require statutory regulation at a national level. Three regulatory models emerged—a News Media Council backed by recourse to the contempt powers of courts; a super self-regulatory body with legislative incentives to join; and the status quo with a strengthened Australian Press Council policing both print and online media. This article reviews the proposals and explores further the suggestion that consumer laws could be better utilised in any reform. It concludes with an assessment of the impact of the inquiries and their recommendations upon free expression in a Western democracy lacking constitutional protection of the media.Mark PearsonAsia Pacific NetworkarticleAustraliaConsumer lawsConvergence ReviewIndependent Media InquiryMedia accountabilityMedia regulationCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 18, Iss 2 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Australia
Consumer laws
Convergence Review
Independent Media Inquiry
Media accountability
Media regulation
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle Australia
Consumer laws
Convergence Review
Independent Media Inquiry
Media accountability
Media regulation
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Mark Pearson
The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
description Two major inquiries into the Australian news media in 2011 and 2012 prompted a necessary debate over the extent to which rapidly converging and globalised news businesses and platforms require statutory regulation at a national level. Three regulatory models emerged—a News Media Council backed by recourse to the contempt powers of courts; a super self-regulatory body with legislative incentives to join; and the status quo with a strengthened Australian Press Council policing both print and online media. This article reviews the proposals and explores further the suggestion that consumer laws could be better utilised in any reform. It concludes with an assessment of the impact of the inquiries and their recommendations upon free expression in a Western democracy lacking constitutional protection of the media.
format article
author Mark Pearson
author_facet Mark Pearson
author_sort Mark Pearson
title The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
title_short The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
title_full The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
title_fullStr The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
title_full_unstemmed The media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
title_sort media regulation debate in a democracy lacking a free expression guarantee
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/7057cf5615c4406ebc3d50328f7c23ba
work_keys_str_mv AT markpearson themediaregulationdebateinademocracylackingafreeexpressionguarantee
AT markpearson mediaregulationdebateinademocracylackingafreeexpressionguarantee
_version_ 1718397291801346048