The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity

Abstract This study examines the usefulness of an extended input–output table (EIOT) incorporating the heterogeneity of Japanese firms based on differences in ratios of imported intermediate goods to total output. Using an EIOT, the vertical specialization indicator of Japan was calculated, which co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satoru Hagino, Jiyoung Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7066f59ecb094bfc99bf5ca329d1f2f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7066f59ecb094bfc99bf5ca329d1f2f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7066f59ecb094bfc99bf5ca329d1f2f92021-12-05T12:10:56ZThe usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity10.1186/s40008-021-00255-32193-2409https://doaj.org/article/7066f59ecb094bfc99bf5ca329d1f2f92021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-021-00255-3https://doaj.org/toc/2193-2409Abstract This study examines the usefulness of an extended input–output table (EIOT) incorporating the heterogeneity of Japanese firms based on differences in ratios of imported intermediate goods to total output. Using an EIOT, the vertical specialization indicator of Japan was calculated, which corresponds to the foreign value added included in exports. In this process, differences in intermediate input ratios were measured examining different types of firms using firm-level microdata from the Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities. The results indicate that distinguishing between exporting and non-exporting firms is relevant for assembly industries such as electronics and automobiles, as widely discussed in the literature. In contrast, for primary materials industries, such as paper, chemical, and metal industries, other distinctions appear to be more relevant. For example, for the chemical industry, wherein firms tend to have large, integrated manufacturing plants, the differences in intermediate import ratios are largest when distinguishing large firms from small and medium firms. For paper and metal industries, which rely on foreign raw materials, the difference is largest when distinguishing between firms with and without foreign affiliates. By incorporating such heterogeneity, the vertical specification indicator increases by 70%; thus, the EIOT captures the foreign value added more comprehensively.Satoru HaginoJiyoung KimSpringerOpenarticleExtended input–output tableTrade in value addedIncorporating firm heterogeneityVertical specializationEconomic growth, development, planningHD72-88Economics as a scienceHB71-74ENJournal of Economic Structures, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-28 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Extended input–output table
Trade in value added
Incorporating firm heterogeneity
Vertical specialization
Economic growth, development, planning
HD72-88
Economics as a science
HB71-74
spellingShingle Extended input–output table
Trade in value added
Incorporating firm heterogeneity
Vertical specialization
Economic growth, development, planning
HD72-88
Economics as a science
HB71-74
Satoru Hagino
Jiyoung Kim
The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
description Abstract This study examines the usefulness of an extended input–output table (EIOT) incorporating the heterogeneity of Japanese firms based on differences in ratios of imported intermediate goods to total output. Using an EIOT, the vertical specialization indicator of Japan was calculated, which corresponds to the foreign value added included in exports. In this process, differences in intermediate input ratios were measured examining different types of firms using firm-level microdata from the Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities. The results indicate that distinguishing between exporting and non-exporting firms is relevant for assembly industries such as electronics and automobiles, as widely discussed in the literature. In contrast, for primary materials industries, such as paper, chemical, and metal industries, other distinctions appear to be more relevant. For example, for the chemical industry, wherein firms tend to have large, integrated manufacturing plants, the differences in intermediate import ratios are largest when distinguishing large firms from small and medium firms. For paper and metal industries, which rely on foreign raw materials, the difference is largest when distinguishing between firms with and without foreign affiliates. By incorporating such heterogeneity, the vertical specification indicator increases by 70%; thus, the EIOT captures the foreign value added more comprehensively.
format article
author Satoru Hagino
Jiyoung Kim
author_facet Satoru Hagino
Jiyoung Kim
author_sort Satoru Hagino
title The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
title_short The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
title_full The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
title_fullStr The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
title_full_unstemmed The usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
title_sort usefulness of extended input–output tables incorporating firm heterogeneity
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7066f59ecb094bfc99bf5ca329d1f2f9
work_keys_str_mv AT satoruhagino theusefulnessofextendedinputoutputtablesincorporatingfirmheterogeneity
AT jiyoungkim theusefulnessofextendedinputoutputtablesincorporatingfirmheterogeneity
AT satoruhagino usefulnessofextendedinputoutputtablesincorporatingfirmheterogeneity
AT jiyoungkim usefulnessofextendedinputoutputtablesincorporatingfirmheterogeneity
_version_ 1718372199045267456