HbA1c of 6.5% to diagnose diabetes mellitus -- does it work for us? -- the Bellville South Africa study.
<h4>Background</h4>HbA1c has been the gold standard for glycaemic control follow-up for decades. In 2009, a level of 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) was proposed as diagnostic for diabetes. We test this cut-off in our community.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants (946) from a community-based stu...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Annalise E Zemlin, Tandi E Matsha, Mogamat S Hassan, Rajiv T Erasmus |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7096061b1e764b5883256691101b6630 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Significance of HbA1c and its measurement in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: US experience
por: Juarez DT, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Polymorphisms in the non-muscle myosin heavy chain gene (MYH9) are associated with lower glomerular filtration rate in mixed ancestry diabetic subjects from South Africa.
por: Tandi Edith Matsha, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Optimal waist-to-height ratio values for cardiometabolic risk screening in an ethnically diverse sample of South African urban and rural school boys and girls.
por: Tandi E Matsha, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
HbA1c for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Is there an optimal cut point to assess high risk of diabetes complications, and how well does the 6.5% cutoff perform?
por: Kowall B, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Thalassemia
por: Yordanov E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)