How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?

Summary: Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for q...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephan Fischer, Jesse Gillis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/709b657275c74c91b0109a76b83ddabb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:709b657275c74c91b0109a76b83ddabb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:709b657275c74c91b0109a76b83ddabb2021-11-20T05:09:30ZHow many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?2589-004210.1016/j.isci.2021.103292https://doaj.org/article/709b657275c74c91b0109a76b83ddabb2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258900422101261Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2589-0042Summary: Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifying marker replicability and selecting replicable markers is currently lacking. Here, using high-quality data from the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), we systematically investigate marker replicability for 85 neuronal cell types. We show that, due to dataset-specific noise, we need to combine 5 datasets to obtain robust differentially expressed (DE) genes, particularly for rare populations and lowly expressed genes. We estimate that 10 to 200 meta-analytic markers provide optimal downstream performance and make available replicable marker lists for the 85 BICCN cell types. Replicable marker lists condense interpretable and generalizable information about cell types, opening avenues for downstream applications, including cell type annotation, selection of gene panels, and bulk data deconvolution.Stephan FischerJesse GillisElsevierarticleCell biologyComplex system biologyTranscriptomicsScienceQENiScience, Vol 24, Iss 11, Pp 103292- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Cell biology
Complex system biology
Transcriptomics
Science
Q
spellingShingle Cell biology
Complex system biology
Transcriptomics
Science
Q
Stephan Fischer
Jesse Gillis
How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
description Summary: Our understanding of cell types has advanced considerably with the publication of single-cell atlases. Marker genes play an essential role for experimental validation and computational analyses such as physiological characterization, annotation, and deconvolution. However, a framework for quantifying marker replicability and selecting replicable markers is currently lacking. Here, using high-quality data from the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), we systematically investigate marker replicability for 85 neuronal cell types. We show that, due to dataset-specific noise, we need to combine 5 datasets to obtain robust differentially expressed (DE) genes, particularly for rare populations and lowly expressed genes. We estimate that 10 to 200 meta-analytic markers provide optimal downstream performance and make available replicable marker lists for the 85 BICCN cell types. Replicable marker lists condense interpretable and generalizable information about cell types, opening avenues for downstream applications, including cell type annotation, selection of gene panels, and bulk data deconvolution.
format article
author Stephan Fischer
Jesse Gillis
author_facet Stephan Fischer
Jesse Gillis
author_sort Stephan Fischer
title How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_short How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_full How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_fullStr How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_full_unstemmed How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
title_sort how many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/709b657275c74c91b0109a76b83ddabb
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanfischer howmanymarkersareneededtorobustlydetermineacellstype
AT jessegillis howmanymarkersareneededtorobustlydetermineacellstype
_version_ 1718419547418001408