Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy

The construction of discourse through choice of wording and sentence structure can affect power relations between people and groups. Social license to operate (SLO), broadly defined as the public's acceptance or approval of a company and its operations, is an emergent concept in New Zealand...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark J. Newton, Trisia A. Farrelly, Jim Sinner
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/70a9082964f742ff9a44d28f1e99a430
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:70a9082964f742ff9a44d28f1e99a430
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:70a9082964f742ff9a44d28f1e99a4302021-12-02T11:00:00ZDiscourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy1708-308710.5751/ES-11304-250102https://doaj.org/article/70a9082964f742ff9a44d28f1e99a4302020-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art2/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087The construction of discourse through choice of wording and sentence structure can affect power relations between people and groups. Social license to operate (SLO), broadly defined as the public's acceptance or approval of a company and its operations, is an emergent concept in New Zealand's marine economy. The way the public discourse around SLO is constructed and communicated can empower some at the expense of others, whether deliberately or inadvertently. This study employed critical discourse analysis to investigate how SLO is used in public documents relating to commercial activities in New Zealand's marine environment between 1996 and 2017. Specifically, the study explores the implied power relations between government, industry, New Zealand's Indigenous tribes (hereafter, iwi), communities, and other stakeholders. We find that industry and central government dominate SLO-related public discourse, and they frequently vest SLO agency with industry rather than community groups, iwi, or the wider public. Indeed, iwi are largely absent from the SLO discourse in public documents. Definitions of SLO vary extensively across the documents and are largely captured by industry and central government. We conclude that New Zealand's marine SLO public discourse empowers industry at the expense of communities and the public, contrary to the notional intent of the concept.Mark J. NewtonTrisia A. FarrellyJim SinnerResilience Alliancearticleaquacultureblue economycorporate social responsibilitydeep sea miningfisheriesoil and gaspowerpublic documentsBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 25, Iss 1, p 2 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic aquaculture
blue economy
corporate social responsibility
deep sea mining
fisheries
oil and gas
power
public documents
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle aquaculture
blue economy
corporate social responsibility
deep sea mining
fisheries
oil and gas
power
public documents
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Mark J. Newton
Trisia A. Farrelly
Jim Sinner
Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy
description The construction of discourse through choice of wording and sentence structure can affect power relations between people and groups. Social license to operate (SLO), broadly defined as the public's acceptance or approval of a company and its operations, is an emergent concept in New Zealand's marine economy. The way the public discourse around SLO is constructed and communicated can empower some at the expense of others, whether deliberately or inadvertently. This study employed critical discourse analysis to investigate how SLO is used in public documents relating to commercial activities in New Zealand's marine environment between 1996 and 2017. Specifically, the study explores the implied power relations between government, industry, New Zealand's Indigenous tribes (hereafter, iwi), communities, and other stakeholders. We find that industry and central government dominate SLO-related public discourse, and they frequently vest SLO agency with industry rather than community groups, iwi, or the wider public. Indeed, iwi are largely absent from the SLO discourse in public documents. Definitions of SLO vary extensively across the documents and are largely captured by industry and central government. We conclude that New Zealand's marine SLO public discourse empowers industry at the expense of communities and the public, contrary to the notional intent of the concept.
format article
author Mark J. Newton
Trisia A. Farrelly
Jim Sinner
author_facet Mark J. Newton
Trisia A. Farrelly
Jim Sinner
author_sort Mark J. Newton
title Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy
title_short Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy
title_full Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy
title_fullStr Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy
title_full_unstemmed Discourse, agency, and social license to operate in New Zealand's marine economy
title_sort discourse, agency, and social license to operate in new zealand's marine economy
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/70a9082964f742ff9a44d28f1e99a430
work_keys_str_mv AT markjnewton discourseagencyandsociallicensetooperateinnewzealandsmarineeconomy
AT trisiaafarrelly discourseagencyandsociallicensetooperateinnewzealandsmarineeconomy
AT jimsinner discourseagencyandsociallicensetooperateinnewzealandsmarineeconomy
_version_ 1718396359799734272