Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)

The article clarifies the possible sources of Osip Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face...” (1912, first published 1913). A new interpretation of references to K. Batyushkov, which more than once attracted the attention of poet’s contemporaries and modern researchers, is prop...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Mark Altschuller
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature 2020
Materias:	osip mandelstam “stone” konstantin batyushkov symbolism acmeism cosmogony Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/70c035249de141618ec627db6303f380
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:70c035249de141618ec627db6303f380
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:70c035249de141618ec627db6303f3802021-11-23T14:02:53ZBatyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)10.22455/2541-8297-2020-15-283-2952541-82972542-2421https://doaj.org/article/70c035249de141618ec627db6303f3802020-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://litfact.ru/images/2020-15/LF-2020-1-15_283-295_Altschuller.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2541-8297https://doaj.org/toc/2542-2421The article clarifies the possible sources of Osip Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face...” (1912, first published 1913). A new interpretation of references to K. Batyushkov, which more than once attracted the attention of poet’s contemporaries and modern researchers, is proposed. According to the author of the article, Mandelstam, theoretically asserting the “thingness” (even super-lightness, quintessence of thingness) of surrounding world as the very essence of poetry, enters into a consistent debate with the mad poet, and through Batyushkov — with Symbolism as a certain world outlook and the artistic system reflecting it. The poem sets a contrast between the phenomena of life that live in real time of the shaky eternity of Symbolism, which fits into the general context of the book “Stone”. As a result of a detailed analysis, it is concluded that Mandelstam’s little poem “No, not the moon...” played a significant role in the history of Russian poetry. At the very initial stage, it reflected the opposition (struggle) of two most important poetic systems of the Silver Age — Symbolism and Acmeism.Mark AltschullerRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticleosip mandelstam“stone”konstantin batyushkovsymbolismacmeismcosmogonyLiterature (General)PN1-6790Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUЛитературный факт, Iss 1 (15), Pp 283-295 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	osip mandelstam “stone” konstantin batyushkov symbolism acmeism cosmogony Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	osip mandelstam “stone” konstantin batyushkov symbolism acmeism cosmogony Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Mark Altschuller Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
description	The article clarifies the possible sources of Osip Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face...” (1912, first published 1913). A new interpretation of references to K. Batyushkov, which more than once attracted the attention of poet’s contemporaries and modern researchers, is proposed. According to the author of the article, Mandelstam, theoretically asserting the “thingness” (even super-lightness, quintessence of thingness) of surrounding world as the very essence of poetry, enters into a consistent debate with the mad poet, and through Batyushkov — with Symbolism as a certain world outlook and the artistic system reflecting it. The poem sets a contrast between the phenomena of life that live in real time of the shaky eternity of Symbolism, which fits into the general context of the book “Stone”. As a result of a detailed analysis, it is concluded that Mandelstam’s little poem “No, not the moon...” played a significant role in the history of Russian poetry. At the very initial stage, it reflected the opposition (struggle) of two most important poetic systems of the Silver Age — Symbolism and Acmeism.
format	article
author	Mark Altschuller
author_facet	Mark Altschuller
author_sort	Mark Altschuller
title	Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
title_short	Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
title_full	Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
title_fullStr	Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
title_full_unstemmed	Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
title_sort	batyushkov’s “arrogance” (on mandelstam’s poem “no, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)
publisher	Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/70c035249de141618ec627db6303f380
work_keys_str_mv	AT markaltschuller batyushkovsarroganceonmandelstamspoemnonotthemoonbutabrightclockface
_version_	1718416708418404352

Batyushkov’s “arrogance” (On Mandelstam’s poem “No, not the moon, but a bright clock-face…”)

Ejemplares similares